Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuriesHitchcock, Henry-Russell
History
Architecture : $b nineteenth and twentieth centuries
Hitchcock, Henry-Russell
Architecture, Modern -- 19th century; Architecture, Modern -- 20th century
Below these Alpine crests, elaborated at the base with rich stone
dormers, the enormous houses are all of fine Portland stone—hardly to be
found in any earlier nineteenth-century London terraces except those of
Ennismore Gardens—and detailed with a plausibly Parisian flair—it is
even said that draughtsmen were sent to Paris to study Second Empire
work at first hand. English are the porches, however, which make plain
that these pretentious ranges are rows of dwellings like those in nearby
Belgrave Square. English, also, are the red stone bands, novel touches
echoing the fashionable ‘structural polychrome’ of the contemporary
Victorian Gothic, just as the tall mansards echo its pointed roofs (see
Chapter 10).
Beyond the first two blocks of Grosvenor Place the new construction of
the sixties stops; but it starts again at the farther end and surrounds
the two triangles of Grosvenor Gardens, of which Knowles’s hotel
occupies part of the farther side. It is characteristic of the Parisian
inspiration of the whole that on the east side of the Gardens great
blocks of flats—’mansions’ in a Victorian euphemism—replaced the usual
London terraces of individual tall houses, but these now serve as
offices as do all the extant houses in Grosvenor Place. For one of these
blocks red brick was used, but set like a mere panel-filling within
stone frames according to a French rather than an English tradition.
There are no other comparably pretentious examples of Second Empire
terraces in London except Cambridge Gate (1875) by Thomas Archer and A.
Green (?-1904), an unhappy intrusion among Nash’s stuccoed Regent’s Park
ranges despite its handsome execution in fine ashlar of Bath stone.
Characteristically, London domestic architecture of the late fifties and
sixties merely elaborated the Renaissance Revival formulas of the
previous decade. Not only were the chosen models generally later and
richer as in Vienna; wherever possible bolder plastic effects were
achieved by a more extensive use of ground-storey colonnades,
first-storey porches, and projecting bay windows, as on Wood’s
magniloquent terraces at Lancaster Gate or those of 1858 by C. J.
Richardson (1800-72) that followed them in Queen’s Gate.
The high standards of the earlier period were maintained only in
business _palazzi_, not those of London’s City, but those in big
Northern towns like Bradford and in Scotland. There good freestone was
readily available and a certain cultural lag, as well as a regional
sobriety of temperament, led to the maintenance of a more Barry-like
tradition. Notable everywhere for their academic virtues are the various
National Provincial Bank buildings by Barry’s pupil John Gibson
(1819-92). The earliest, but not the most typical, is the head office in
Bishopsgate, which was begun in 1863.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account