The “chacarero” does not grow barley for the same reason that
he neglects or ignores almost every branch of agriculture
except wheat, maize and linseed. For the same reason that he
neglects rotation, fallow and weeds; vegetables and small
fruits; live-stock breeding and feeding; poultry, dairy,
and bee-hiving, tree planting; and the greatest of all
cultures—home culture. He has no fixity of tenure. There is no
other reason.
It is said of the Argentine “chacarero” that he is ignorant and
incapable of good husbandry. When he first began, of course, he
was ignorant. The gold medallist from an Agricultural College
is ignorant when he begins to practise farming. Though the
farmer’s craft engages the whole cyclopædia of science, and
there is no limit to the knowledge it demands, its practice
is essentially one of observation and local experience. To
those the “chacarero” comes as well equipped as another. His
ignorance is but the reflection of his environment.
It is also said of him that he is greedy, and undertakes a
larger area than he can cultivate. Again, his greed is but the
reflection of the landowner’s. He is called to the land on
terms that exclude all fixity of tenure, maintenance of soil
values, small farming, rotation or live-stock values; terms
that merely bind him to plough as best he can a given area, to
seed it in cereals that will enable his landlord to collect
without inconvenience his rent in kind, delivered “dry, sound
and bagged” at the foot of the threshing mill; to continue this
process for three or more years; and at the end of his term to
go to the devil if his unsuccess has not already landed him in
that quarter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account