Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Inasmuch as the report of the office shows that there is a good
handsome surplus of cash received, more than enough to pay for all the
expense of maintaining the Copyright Office, and in addition to that
some 213,000 objects, which the Librarian says are of great value to
the Nation--books, paintings, etc.--and in view of the small profit in
the manufacture of our goods, and the fact that in the conduct of our
business we have to make long-term contracts with general agents who
handle our goods, selling them over the entire world, and that our
contracts have been made for a long term of years, this 100 per cent
advance upon our class of goods would practically put us out of
business.
Mr. CHANEY. Suppose we except those views?
Mr. REMICH. I have no objection to that. You will see that they have
tried to modify this provision somewhat by a section at the bottom of
the twenty-fifth page of the conference report, in which they say----
Mr. CURRIER. The thirty-eighth page of the bill, gentlemen.
Mr. REMICH. The thirty-eighth page of the bill, in which they say:
_Provided further_, That only one registration at one fee shall be
required in the case of several volumes of the same book or
periodical deposited at the same time, or of a numbered series of
any work specified in subsections H, J, K, and L of section 5 of
this act--
Which includes our class of products--
where such series represents the same subject with variances only
in pose or composition, and the items composing it are deposited at
the same time under one title with a view to a single registration.
As a lawyer, I suggest that would inject a dangerous element into our
business, if we tried to copyright a series of pictures which we
claimed only differed from each other in pose, and we should have more
litigation on our hands in a month than you could shake a stick at. It
would ruin any stereoscopic view concern in a little while.
As I suggested in our conference, that clause would apply
satisfactorily to gallery work where a man, for instance, took my
distinguished friend, the Representative from my district, Mr.
Currier, in a gallery, and took a side view, a front view, a view
standing up, a view sitting down, a view with his chin turned up, and
a view with his nose turned out. In such a case there would be no
change save in pose. But we send artists all over the world. We had an
artist in the Japanese army during this war, and with the Russian
army, and in the South African war, and in Cuba, and in the Boxer war.
Our negatives are largely snapshots of moving objects and things. We
may get one distinguished general in one snapshot, the next negative
we make will show another distinguished general.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account