Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
The CHAIRMAN. I think it only fair that in your case as well as that
of the other gentlemen the time devoted to questions should not be
considered as part of your time, and taken out of your time; but I
would like to ask one or two questions before you begin. Do you
understand that this bill proposes to interfere with existing patent
rights?
Mr. DAVIS. Yes, sir.
The CHAIRMAN. Vested rights?
Mr. DAVIS. Yes, sir. I shall take that up first, if you please.
Senator SMOOT. You mean, then, that section 3 is the section that
interferes with them?
(Mr. Davis looks for the bill.)
Senator SMOOT. If you have not it there, do not bother about looking
for it now. Go right on.
Mr. DAVIS. I had a marked copy here.
Senator SMOOT. We will listen to you when you come to that section,
anyhow.
The CHAIRMAN. You may proceed, Mr. Davis, and we will not interrupt
you during your twenty minutes.
Mr. DAVIS. Thank you, sir.
I would like to first explain that I am here without counsel and
without any previous notice from the Copyright Office, and without
invitation from any source whatever. I discovered the existence of the
proposed bill by mere accident on Saturday last. I was then notified
that a firm which operates under my patents would have to go out of
business if this law passed, and would necessarily have to cancel its
licenses with me. That concern is the Perforated Music Roll Company,
with offices at 25 West Twenty-third street, New York City. I have
also just to-day received similar intimation from another concern
manufacturing under my patents in Philadelphia, the Electrelle
Company, just organized for a million dollars for the manufacture
under my patents for reproducing music mechanically.
I have been inventing in numerous classes during the last twenty
years, including printing presses, typesetting machines, typewriting
machines, clocks, stencil duplicating apparatus, etc., but about ten
years ago I took up the class of self-playing musical instruments. I
recognized that there was a peculiar relation of this art to
copyrighted musical compositions, and I saw that in some way whatever
devices I might invent for the reproduction of music mechanically
might interfere with the composer's rights, because music is a
necessary component part of the class of self-playing musical
instruments, and you all know that this industry has become one of the
greatest of the young industries of the country. You can take up any
magazine and you will see many pages filled with descriptions of
self-playing musical devices, including phonographs, graphophones,
apollos, angeluses, cecilians, pianophones, and a hundred other
devices for reproducing music automatically. As far as I am able to
ascertain none of these concerns have had notice of this bill, and the
two concerns who are operating under my patents not only have had no
notice, but have notified me, as before stated, that in case of the
passage of the bill they will have to annul their contracts with me.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account