Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. DAVIS. I thank you. Now, the Æolian Company, being back of the
independent members of the Music Publishers' Association, have
influenced in turn the music publishers as an association to insert in
this bill clauses which will cover mechanical methods of reproducing
music; and in proof of this I will say that as a result of Mr.
Solberg's kindness yesterday afternoon in allowing me to search the
records of the star-chamber proceedings presided over by the Librarian
of Congress, that the first introduction of those clauses was made by
Mr. Bacon for the Music Publishers' Association in the form of an
amendment which now appears in all of its substantial terms as
subdivision (_g_) page 2, of the bill. Now, the independent music
publishers in turn control the great majority of composers, so that
there is thus formed a complete monopolistic octopus, in which the
Æolian Company forms the head and brains, the Music Publishers'
Association the body, the independent publishers the writhing arms,
and the composers the suckers and baiters. [Applause.]
The Æolian Company is a ten-million-dollar concern whose monopolistic
game has already been uncovered in several courts, as I will show by
proofs, and the music publishers are here to pull its chestnuts out of
the fire. [Applause.]
Now, if the inventors of this country knew what was in this bill there
would be enough here to fill up every room in this great building, but
they do not know it. It will strike them like a thunderbolt out of a
clear sky when they learn that there are clauses in this bill which
not only seem to lessen or destroy the scope and commercial value of
our existing patent and confiscate our physical property, etc., but
also imprison us in case we infringe the proposed copyright act.
Now I will read you from----
Mr. CHANEY. What is your first subheading there that you are going to
talk from?
Mr. DAVIS. That it will discourage invention, but I would like to take
up this bill first; I would like to take it a little out of set up in
my preamble.
Mr. CURRIER. Subdivision (_g_) on page 2?
Mr. DAVIS. Subdivision (_b_) on page 1.
Mr. CHANEY. All right; "To sell, distribute, exhibit, or let for
hire," etc.?
Mr. DAVIS. Yes, sir.
Mr. CURRIER. I do not see how that touches your industry.
Mr. DAVIS. No, sir; I had my marked copy here----
Mr. CURRIER. I should say "(_g_)" was the first one that would affect
you.
Mr. DAVIS. Yes, sir "(_g_);" you are right, Mr. Currier.
Mr. CHANEY. That is, "To make, sell, distribute, or let for hire any
device, contrivance," etc.?
Mr. DAVIS. "To make, sell, distribute, or let for hire any device,
contrivance, or appliance especially adapted in any manner whatsoever
to reproduce to the ear the whole or any material part of any work
published and copyrighted after this act shall have gone into effect,
or by means of any such device or appliance publicly to reproduce to
the ear the whole or any material part of such work."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account