Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. O'CONNELL. Then I assumed, from the remarks made by some members
of the committee, that they considered the act to apply only to
compositions originally composed after the passage of this act, and
originally copyrighted after the passage of this act. I do not
believe, therefore, that the members of the committee are aware of the
very many peculiar features of the bill in that regard.
Mr. CHANEY. The bill is only submitted as a tentative proposition, to
get at the right thing. It is not the result of our genius at all. It
belongs to some of the rest of you fellows.
Mr. O'CONNELL. It does not belong, Mr. Chaney, to me or the rest of my
fellows; and we are here trying to oppose the genius of the other men,
the specially interested ones who did submit it to your committee.
[Laughter.]
Mr. CHANEY. Well, we fellows are not trying to shut out you fellows.
Mr. O'CONNELL. I know that you are not, and all we want is a fair,
full, and complete hearing.
Taking first, Mr. Chairman and gentlemen of the committees,
subdivision F of the first paragraph. There is still a subdivision B
in that subdivision F:
To make any arrangement or setting of such work, or of the melody
thereof, In any system of notation.
Mr. CHANEY. On page 2?
Mr. O'CONNELL. I am reading from the House bill.
Mr. CHANEY. We have the Senate bill here. What is the section?
Mr. O'CONNELL. Section 1, subdivision F.
Senator SMOOT. It is on page 2.
Mr. O'CONNELL. It gives the right--
to make any arrangement or setting of such work, or of the melody
thereof, in any system of notation.
Then it goes on (subdivision G):
To make, sell, distribute or let for hire any device, contrivance,
or appliance especially adapted in any manner whatsoever to
reproduce to the ear the whole or any material part of the work
published and copyrighted after this act shall have gone into
effect, or by means of any such device or appliance publicly to
reproduce to the ear the whole or any material part of such work.
Mr. WEBB. Before you leave that, do you not think that section G
prohibits the sale of the instrument itself, rather than the
reproduction of the music or the work? You are a lawyer.
Mr. O'CONNELL. It would seem that it prohibits both, sir.
Mr. BURKAN. We will submit an amendment to cover that.
Mr. WEBB. It seems that that is a prohibition of the sale of any
instrument.
Mr. CURRIER. Clearly so.
Mr. O'CONNELL. I have not seen the proposed amendment, because it was
only handed in this morning after we got here.
Turning to section 6, it says--and this is very important:
That additions to copyrighted works and alterations, revisions,
abridgments, dramatizations, translations, compilations,
arrangements, or other versions of works, whether copyrighted or in
the public domain, shall be regarded as new works, subject to
copyright under the provisions of this act.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account