Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. O'CONNELL. I have been informed, while Mr. Walker was speaking, in
response to what Mr. Bowker said, that in this White-Smith suit the
complainants tried in every possible way to prove the truth of the
assertion which Mr. Bowker has just made, and that they utterly and
totally failed to sustain that assertion that those sheets could be
read, even with the use of any kind of a scale. That has just been
stated to me by a gentleman who is interested.
If you please, Mr. Chairman, the portion of the decision relating to
that particular point has been handed to me, and here it is----
Mr. CHANEY. We have that decision.
Mr. O'CONNELL. I want to call attention briefly to just this point in
it:
It is not designed to be read or actually used in reading music as
the original staff notation is; and the claim that it may be read,
which is practically disproved by the great preponderance of
evidence, even if it were true, would establish merely a theory of
possibility of use as distinguished from an actual use.
In deciding those cases, courts and committees of Congress do not act
on possibilities.
Here is another method of reproduction [exhibiting disk] of the same
march of Mr. Sousa's. It is for use in a music box. I do not know what
the name of the music box is. The disk was only handed to me this
morning. That shows another method of reproducing, and I do not
suppose that even Mr. Bowker, with the aid of a scale, can read the
notes on it. [Laughter.]
Again, there is still another one here [exhibiting cylinder], which
has been handed to me by Mr. Walker, a phonograph record, which he
unfortunately says he broke, and which contains the same march by Mr.
Sousa. And I do not believe that even Mr. Bowker, with the aid of any
kind of a scale, can read that.
Mr. BOWKER. My name has been mentioned, and may I say that the
character of the phonograph record which uses the very word "graph,"
meaning "writing," represents the earliest form of writing, that of
incised character writing.
Mr. CHANEY. Of the time of Rameses.
Mr. DAVIS. May I state that it remained for the inventor to first
devise that scale to which that perforated music was made, and,
second, to devise a machine which would interpret that music to Mr.
Currier, or all of the other members of the public, as a medium by
which any music could be read. That is the only practicable way of
reading it, and that was left to the inventor. A mere reversal of that
scale, to read backwards, would not be requisite.
Mr. SOUSA. I would like to ask the gentleman a question. What value
would these various records have if my march was not on them--if I had
never written that march?
Mr. O'CONNELL. I will say to Mr. Sousa with perfect frankness that the
only object of that particular record is to produce his march.
[Laughter.]
Mr. SOUSA. Without my consent.
Mr. O'CONNELL. I shall not try to hedge. I merely state facts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account