Subdivision third of that section 23, says: "In the case of a dramatic or musical composition not less than $100 for the first and not less than $50 for every subsequent infringing performance." I submit, Mr. Chairman and gentlemen, that we are also liable to that penalty as well as the $10 a roll, because these very astute gentlemen who are back of this bill, on the very first infringement will claim that any performance on an automatic piano player whereby Mr. Sousa's march or Mr. Herbert's composition is played on a pianola or one of the independent pianos, is a musical performance, and that for the first performance, in addition to the $10 a roll, we are liable to be fined $100, and for each subsequent performance $50. I think that this section, if the other provisions of the bill are to remain in, should be amended so as to say that this shall not include a performance on a perforated music roll or on phonograph or music machine disks. Some other extraordinary provisions of the penalties are, first, this subdivision C of the fourth paragraph of section 23 provides that the infringer is-- to deliver up on oath to be impounded during the pendency of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe, all goods alleged to infringe a copyright. That is an extraordinary provision. They get an injunction pendente lite, and not alone that, but we have to deliver up to them everything pendente lite. The injunction is not good enough, and we have to give the goods to them. Next, it says (subsection D): To deliver up, on oath, for destruction all the infringing copies or devices, as well as all plates, molds, matrices, or other means for making such infringing copies. It may be proper, as in the old act, to direct the infringer to deliver up the copies or the plates from which they are made, but it is absolutely revolutionary to direct that the machinery be delivered up, because that machinery may be useful for perfectly legitimate purposes, and yet it must be delivered up for destruction. It also provides that all those results can be obtained in a single action. As to the jurisdiction of courts in suits of this kind, here is the provision of the bill: SEC. 32. That all actions arising under the copyright laws of the United States shall be originally cognizable by the circuit courts of the United States, the district court of any Territory, the supreme court of the District of Columbia, the district courts of Alaska, Hawaii, and Porto Rico, and the courts of first instance of the Philippine Islands. Actions arising under this act may be instituted in the district of which the defendant is an inhabitant, or in the district where the violation of any provision of this act has occurred.