Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Let us go one step further. At a recent banquet in Portland, Oreg., of
the "Ad. Men's Association," by arrangement with the telephone
company, over the seat of every person who participated in that
banquet there was a little horn attached to the telephone, and there
was a Columbia graphophone at the central office. But if this bill
becomes a law the telephone company would not dare do that. They would
not dare give the people in the country the privilege of an evening's
entertainment, where they can not get to the big cities, without first
arranging with Mr. Herbert. Mr. Herbert would say: "No; you can not do
this. I want a hundred dollars' profit before you do that." After you
have done it, everybody who pays a toll of 5 cents for an evening's
entertainment to the telephone company pays its tribute to Mr.
Herbert. I do not believe that that is the intention of you gentlemen.
I regret that I am so much limited as to time, and I hope to appear
before you during the summer session, as I believe that I can throw
some new light on the situation.
Mr. CURRIER. You gentlemen speak of the committee holding sessions
during the summer season. The House has no such authority. The members
of the House are likely to have a very busy season, and it will be
impossible to get the House committee here during the summer. But the
House committee will be here on the first Monday in December, ready to
hear you gentlemen.
Mr. CROMELIN. I thank you very much for your attention.
Mr. CHANEY. In the statement that you submit I would like to have you
make it specific as to which sections you object to, and make your
argument apply to those sections.
Mr. CROMELIN. I shall be glad to do that.
Senator SMOOT. And let it follow your remarks in the record?
Mr. CROMELIN. Yes, sir.
STATEMENT OF ALBERT H. WALKER, ESQ., OF NEW YORK.
Mr. WALKER. Gentlemen of the committee, I sincerely thank you for the
compliment implied in giving me an hour in which to express my views
upon this bill. The allowance is liberal, and it will not be extended
except at the request of the committee. My hour will be an hour of
sixty minutes, and my remarks will end at twenty minutes before 12, if
they end in the middle of a sentence.
I do not appear in behalf of any particular interest, although I have
one client which is interested in one section of the bill. I do not
propose, however, to address myself particularly to the interests of
that client. I do propose to address myself to the bill as a whole.
I think that the gentlemen who prepared this bill are to be thanked by
the committee, and by the people of the United States, and by
everybody else, for the large amount of labor which they have devoted
to the preparation of that proposition for legislation. I particularly
desire to express my personal appreciation of the labors of Mr.
Putnam--his entirely disinterested and very skillful labors in the
preparation of the bill.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account