Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
But it is believed that section 4966 of the present statute has
been tacitly treated as meaning something which the legislature in
enacting it never intended, and that the provisions in the present
bill, developing into express terms that which has been tacitly
treated as involved in the terms of said section of the present
law, crystalizes into dangerous permanency a defect which would
have been eliminated from the present statute whenever the United
States courts had occasion to review it.
Protection for public performance is justifiable only in respect
to compositions which by their nature yield no considerable
revenue to the author by the sale of copies or otherwise than by
public performance. Dramatic compositions clearly fall within this
class. A dramatic composition is written primarily to be performed
and only incidentally to be read. Some dramatic compositions may
have such literary character that they would be bought to be read
and so little dramatic quality that they will not be largely
performed; but the dramatic composition whose value is in
performance and not in reading gets little protection from the
copyright statute without special provision giving monopoly of
public performance. A hundred copies will supply all the actors
who need it; no one else wants it; but a million people will be
glad to see it performed and will pay high prices for their seats.
The dramatic writer must get his revenue from the million--not
from the hundred--or he will fail of adequate compensation.
Recognizing this situation, Congress, in 1870, enacted the
following provision:
"SEC. 4966. Any person publicly performing or representing any
dramatic composition for which copyright has been obtained,
without the consent of the proprietor or his heirs or assigns,
shall be liable," etc.
In 1897 the section was amended by inserting the provisions now
contained in section 4966, making it include musical compositions,
the words "or musical" being inserted after the word "dramatic" in
the second line of above.
There can be no reasonable doubt that the intention of the
amendment of this section, by making it refer also to musical
compositions, was to include musical-dramatic with other simple
dramatic compositions; that is, to make the scope of the
protection take in all compositions whose value rested in dramatic
performance as distinguished from mere vocalization.
The word "perform" in the section clearly points to this
significance and intention.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account