Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
No single publisher, gentlemen, had sufficient funds to carry on such
an expensive litigation, because these music publishers are not the
millionaires that our friends on the other side have attempted to
point out and show. Most of them are poor men. No single composer
would be able to supply the funds to carry on such a litigation. There
was a great deal involved; and when this company came and said:
"Gentlemen, we will take up this litigation; we will try to establish
your rights; but for our trouble, if we do establish your rights, if
we can get the highest court in the land to decide that the present
copyright laws are applicable to these perforated sheets, then we want
the exclusive rights to manufacture perforated rolls adapted to
reproduce your music upon specified royalties for a number of years."
Was there anything inherently wrong in that? A number of publishers
naturally jumped at that offer. It would mean to a large publisher
thousands of dollars if the courts decided in his favor. At the time
when this offer was made, the perforated roll companies were
appropriating his copyrighted music for which he received not a single
penny. And the contract that was entered into between the Æolian
Company and some of the publishers, a copy of which was offered in
evidence here, provides that the consideration for this agreement was
this litigation. Nothing was concealed; everything in connection with
this contract was done in the open, and the consideration for the
contract is expressed in the contract as follows:
And for and in consideration of the premises the Æolian Company
hereby covenants and agrees to pay all proper expenses of
conducting such suit for the purpose of testing the applicability
of the United States copyright laws to perforated music sheets of
kinds aforesaid, and that if the court of last resort shall in such
suit decide that the United States copyright laws are applicable to
such perforated music sheets, then and in such, case and from that
time forward the Æolian Company will keep the books of account and
pay the royalties.
These gentlemen, the publishers who made this contract, did not have
in mind the creation of a monopoly. Each publisher, naturally, as any
other business man, wanted to get something for his property, and it
was very advantageous to the publisher to get the highest court to
decide in his favor, without paying the enormous expense of such a
litigation. Mr. Davis, the inventor of these perforated rolls,
properly said--he said it truthfully and honestly--"My invention
depends upon Mr. Sousa and Mr. Herbert and their compositions." The
music of these gentlemen is a component part of my invention.
The ACTING CHAIRMAN. The Æolian Company, as the law stood, did not
have to pay to musical publishers a cent?
Mr. BURKAN. Not a cent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account