Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. WEBB. You would have no right to represent it as his voice, his
work.
Mr. BURKAN. That is what they are doing--representing it as his, the
composer's work, and Mr. Herbert's work is judged by the reproduction
of it by these mechanical devices. The public says, "That is Victor
Herbert's composition," or "That is Mr. Chadwick's composition." And I
want to say to the gentlemen here that this proposed law does not only
cover music, but it covers poems, speeches, and stories.
Now, then, some of these men made this contract. This contract is
solely dependent upon the decision of the Supreme Court. It is not
dependent upon any legislation at all, and the Æolian Company took
absolutely no part in this legislation. The Music Publishers'
Association received an invitation from Mr. Putnam to appear at the
conferences, and we appeared, and we naturally were interested in
getting this legislation. But I say this----
Mr. CROMELIN. Mr. Chairman, may I interrupt one moment?
Mr. CROMELIN. May I deny that?
The ACTING CHAIRMAN. You will suspend.
Mr. BURKAN. The Æolian Company took absolutely no part, had nothing
whatever to do with this legislation at all. And I say to you, sir,
that if the purpose of these contracts is to stifle competition and to
control the industry of making perforated rolls and talking-machine
cylinders, then the Sherman Act covers contracts of this kind. I say
to you that the Donnelly Act or antitrust law in our State (New York)
is very stringent; if it should appear to Mr. Jerome or to the
attorney-general of New York, in which State the Æolian Company has
its principal place of business, that these contracts tend to stifle
trade, or were entered into to destroy competition, each one of these
conspirators could be sent to jail, and could be restrained by
injunction from enforcing the contracts. We have antitrust laws, sir;
and under those laws each of these men could be restrained by
injunction from enforcing the contract and criminally punished for
entering into it.
The ACTING CHAIRMAN. Your time has expired. Mr. Cromelin, you may have
one minute to contradict any statement he has made.
Mr. CROMELIN. Mr. Chairman, just one minute. Just before leaving New
York Saturday I spoke with the manager of the Æolian Company, and I
wish this to go on record--that he told me that they did not want to
oppose this legislation; that they had contracts; and when people have
contracts of this kind they do not go to the house tops and proclaim
the fact. The only reason you know of this contract, sir, is because
it is a matter of record in the case of the Apollo Company in the
second circuit of New York.
Mr. CHANEY. Do you mean to say that this contract is an improper one
to make?
Mr. CROMELIN. Not at all; I did not say that, sir.
Mr. CHANEY. Then what concern is it to us, who are engaged in framing
this bill, about that contract?
Mr. CROMELIN. The chairman asked the gentleman whether the Æolian
Company was interested in this----
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account