Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
_Section 13._--In this section typesetting and the lithographic
process are singled out from all other processes connected with
the manufacture of printed books, and given distinct protection
from foreign competition over all other processes in making books
that are copyrightable in the United States. Any such
discrimination is unjust, and if this section is retained, the
protection should be broadened to include any other processes
besides lithography.
I would therefore suggest that section 13 be amended as follows:
After the words "lithographic process," in the seventh line, and
after the same words on page 6, first line, nineteenth line, and
thirtieth line, there be inserted the words "or any other process
or method," and after the words "a process," in the same line,
the words "or method."
That the word "lithographs" in the second and third lines of the
same page be erased, and the word "illustrations" be inserted in
place of it; and on the same page, in the third line of that
portion of section 13 on that page that the words "where" and
"either" be erased. My preference would be to see the whole
section dropped out, but failing in this no undue preference
should be shown any one or two methods connected with the
manufacture of books.
_Section 39._--In its present form could be made clearer if it is
intended to secure to an author of an original work of the fine
arts any copyright which he may have obtained under the statutes
on his work. On the other hand, if the section is intended to
secure to an author or artist any potential copyright in a work
on which he had not duly secured statutory copyright, then such
provision, it would seem, would be unreasonable and unjust to the
purchaser of the work; and I would therefore suggest the
following wording for this section: "The author of any original
work of the fine arts being the owner of such a work and having
copyrighted it according to the provisions of this act or any
previous United States copyright act, and who has marked upon
such original work such notice of copyright as may be required by
the act under which the work was copyrighted, shall not be deemed
to sell or transfer said copyright upon selling or transferring
the original work of art unless an agreement in writing covering
the transfer of said copyright be signed by the author."
_Section 37._--Is open to the same criticism as section 39. It
might be corrected by the following changes, viz: That in the
third and fourth lines the words "which is the subject of
copyright" be struck out and the word "copyrighted" substituted
for them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account