Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Mr. CUTTER. Mr. Chairman and gentlemen, I claim to represent no
association, nor to represent myself personally. I claim to represent
only the public libraries of the following cities: Chicago, St. Louis,
Baltimore, Louisville, Pittsburg, Newark, Minneapolis, Los Angeles,
and Springfield, Mass. Also the libraries of the following
universities and colleges: Yale, Cornell, Colgate, Wisconsin,
Michigan, Amherst, and Brown; the New York State Library and the
Connecticut State Library; the Western Massachusetts Library Club,
comprising a membership of forty libraries, and the Connecticut
Library Association, representing the organization of libraries in
Connecticut. I wish to speak a few moments on that provision contained
at the bottom of page 24 of the Senate print of the bill.
Mr. WEBB. What section?
Mr. CUTTER. Section 30; the third subsection of section 30, at the
bottom of page 24, line 25, including all after the words "United
States"--in other words, that portion of the bill which prohibits
importation by public institutions of a certain class of books.
You are well aware of the fact that existing law allows public
libraries to import two copies of any book without any restriction as
to what the book shall be. There are certain points that will make the
suggested legislation a great hardship to the libraries.
Mr. CURRIER. Pardon me just a minute. Can you import two copies of an
unauthorized edition?
Mr. CUTTER. Yes, sir.
Mr. CURRIER. Can you do that to-day?
Mr. CUTTER. Yes, sir; we can now.
Mr. CURRIER. A fraudulent reprint, for instance?
Mr. CUTTER. Yes, sir.
Mr. CURRIER. There is absolutely no restriction, as you understand it
to-day?
Mr. CUTTER. There is no restriction at all, as I understand, on
library importations; but there is in this bill in regard to it.
Mr. CURRIER. I was asking about existing law.
Mr. CUTTER. Yes; I understand that libraries can import any books that
they wish.
Mr. CURRIER. I had the contrary opinion, but I may be mistaken.
Mr. CHANEY. You object to that entire part of the bill, do you?
Mr. CUTTER. Yes; I object to it principally for this reason: In
importations for large libraries, such as those that I represent--it
does not apply to small libraries which import only a small number of
books--a case of books will come in from abroad, books that are not
copyrighted in this country, English books. One book in that case
might, by a mistake, be one which was copyrighted here, printed in
England, and containing no notice of its copyright in the United
States of America. If that fact was discovered it would send all of
that box of books to public store; it would place all the box of
books, as I understand, in danger of being destroyed; and it would
place the librarian who did the importing in danger of having to show
the Secretary of the Treasury, under this law, that he was not guilty
of trying to import that book illicitly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account