Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
History
Arguments before the Committee on Patents of the House of Representatives, conjointly with the Senate Committee on Patents, on H.R. 19853, to amend and consolidate the acts respecting copyright: June 6, 7, 8, and 9, 1906.
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Patents
Copyright -- United States
Senator MALLORY. Do I understand you to say that that book trust is
still in operation?
Mr. CUTTER. Certainly.
Now, I am connected with a library that spends $12,000 a year for
books in a country town. Of this sum $5,000 is spent for English
books. I am a representative of a city government which taxes itself
to a certain extent to educate the people in its community, and I
object seriously to paying $1,000 of that $12,000 to American
publishers as a tax. That is my point.
Mr. CURRIER. What changes in this bill do you suggest?
Mr. CUTTER. I should suggest the entire elimination of that provision.
Mr. CURRIER. Of the entire paragraph?
Mr. CUTTER. No; after the words "United States."
Mr. CURRIER. That was the suggestion I made some time ago--after the
words "United States," in line 25.
Mr. CHANEY. Yes; precisely.
Mr. CURRIER. Would that be satisfactory to the people whom you
represent?
Mr. CUTTER. That would be satisfactory. I think it would be
satisfactory to all librarians.
Mr. HINSHAW. This would allow you to import, however, but one book,
whereas you have had the privilege of importing two?
Mr. CUTTER. One book, but we are perfectly satisfied with that. I
think any library would be. A ruling of the Treasury Department has
held that a branch library is a library itself, so that in the case of
a large library wanting a book for each of several branches it would
be possible to import more than one.
Mr. CURRIER. With that stricken out, the people you represent would
not object to sections 26, 27, 28, and 29?
Mr. CUTTER. No; it does not affect them.
The other point I wish to make is on behalf of another interest. I
wish to speak a word in behalf of an interest which is not represented
here at all--two interests, in fact. The first is the firms that are
in the business of importing books into this country and are not
represented and have not been asked to be represented; have not been
asked to come to these meetings. There are certain firms that are not
in the publishing business that are in the business of importing
books.
Mr. CURRIER. I think we ought to say right there, as you say they have
not been asked, that the committee invites everybody.
Mr. CUTTER. Yes; I mean up to this time they have not been asked.
Mr. CURRIER. Those who were not represented at the conference, as well
as those who were.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account