Here it will be seen that in place of the words given in Waitz's text, [Greek: pa=n ga\r to\ _a)/cholon_ makro/bion], Pacius gives [Greek: pa=n ga\r _to\ G_ makro/bion]: annexing however to the letter [Greek: G] an asterisk referring to the margin, where we find the word [Greek: a)/cholon] inserted in small letters, seemingly as a various reading not approved by Pacius. And M. Barthélemy St. Hilaire has accommodated his French translation (p. 328) to the text of Pacius: "Donc A est à C tout entier, car tout C est longève." Boethius in his Latin translation (p. 519) recognizes as his original [Greek: pa=n ga\r to\ a)/cholon makro/bion], but he alters the text in the words immediately preceding:--"Ergo _toti B_ (instead of _toti C_) inest A, omne enim quod sine cholera est, longævum," &c. (p. 519). The edition of Aldus (Venet. 1495) has the text conformable to the Latin of Boethius: [Greek: tô=| dê\ B o(/lô| u(pa/rchei to\ A; pa=n ga\r to\ a)/cholon makro/bion]. Three distinct Latin translations of the 16th century are adapted to the same text, viz., that of Vives and Valentinus (Basil. 1542); that published by the Junta (Venet. 1552); and that of Cyriacus (Basil. 1563). Lastly, the two Greek editions of Sylburg (1587) and Casaubon (Lugduni 1590), have the same text also: [Greek: tô=| dê\ B o(/lô| u(pa/rchei to\ A; pa=n ga\r [to\ G] to\ a)/cholon makro/bion]. Casaubon prints in brackets the words [Greek: [to\ G]] before [Greek: to\ a)/cholon]. Now it appears to me that the text of Bekker and Waitz (though Waitz gives it without any comment or explanation) is erroneous; neither consisting with itself, nor conforming to the general view enunciated by Aristotle of the Syllogism from Induction. I have cited two distinct versions, each different from this text, as given by the earliest editors; in both the confusion appears to have been felt, and an attempt made to avoid it, though not successfully. Aristotle's view of the Syllogism from Induction is very clearly explained by M. Barthélemy St. Hilaire in the instructive notes of his translation, pp. 326-328; also in his Preface, p. lvii.:--"L'induction n'est au fond qu'un syllogisme dont le mineur et le moyen sont d'extension égale. Du reste, il n'est qu'une seule manière dont le moyen et le mineur puissent être d'égale extension; c'est que le mineur se compose de toutes les parties dont le moyen représente la totalité. D'une part, tous les individus: de l'autre, l'espèce totale qu'ils forment. L'intelligence fait aussitôt équation entre les deux termes égaux." According to the Aristotelian text, as given both by Pacius and the others, A, the major term, represents _longævum_ (long-lived, the class-term or total); B, the middle term, represents _vacans bile_ (bile-less, the class-term or total); C, the minor term, represents the aggregate individuals of the class _longævum_, man, horse, mule, &c. Julius Pacius draws out the Inductive Syllogism, thus:--