Arius the Libyan: A Romance of the Primitive ChurchKouns, Nathan C. (Nathan Chapman)
Religion
Arius the Libyan: A Romance of the Primitive Church
Kouns, Nathan C. (Nathan Chapman)
Arius, -approximately 336 -- Fiction
"If it come out of the Scriptures, friend Athanasius, they must omit
therefrom thy newly-coined word ’Catholic,’ for that word is not
scriptural, nor is the idea which thou signifiest by it therein. The
Scriptures speak not of the ’Catholic’ Church at all, but of ’the common
church,’ ’the common faith,’ ’the common salvation,’ ’the common hope,’
’the common Saviour’; and thou well knowest that ’common’ pertaineth
only to the common or communal organization of Christ’s kingdom. Yet,
perhaps, it is natural that one so young, so beautiful, so gifted as
thou art, should prefer the imperial and aristocratic designation which
hath been recently adopted in the Western Empire, and despise the
plebeian, scriptural name ’common’ or ’communal.’ For two Christians
might both belong to thy ’Catholic’ Church, while one of them might be a
prince and the other a pauper; but the two Christians who belong to the
primitive ’common’ church must be brethren, equal, free, fraternal; and
the difference, friend Athanasius, between ’common’ ([Greek: _koínos_])
and ’catholic’ ([Greek: _kata holos_]) is just the difference between
the Christian Church and that of Constantine. I know not what the
martyrs would have said of it, nor what the steadfast confessors here
present may think of it; but I prefer the ancient, scriptural term
’common,’ ’communal,’ ’communistic’ church of which Jesus Christ only is
King, and in which all men are brethren, to the new ’Catholic’
establishment which has come in with our unbaptized emperor."
There was not a confessor present but what would have applauded these
bold and truthful sentiments, the force of which we can at this day with
difficulty realize; but Constantine bit his lip to restrain a terrible
oath, and his face darkened ominously as he glared upon the audacious
presbyter. Hosius, Marcellus, Alexander, and others of the same party,
seemed to have been stricken dumb by the clear, incisive, fearless, and
uncompromising declarations of Arius. Only Athanasius seemed to
preserve his marvelous self-possession, and laughed musically, while, in
order to distract attention from the dangerous question which the old
heretic seemed determined to bring up at every possible turn of the
discussion, he cried aloud: "But hast thou not commonly taught that the
Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are three, and not one God, and thereby made
thy heresy assume the complexion of polytheism? Hast thou not done
that?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account