Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic daysGabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
History
Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic days
Gabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
Armenia; Armenian question
Russia was apparently fighting for the oppressed Christians. The Turks
were called upon to combat with a Christian nation, which was fighting
as the champion of the Christian subjects of the Ottoman government.
The officials of the government well may say: what do we care for these
wretched Christians who are a constant source of trouble to us? The
ignorant Turkish soldiers and the _bashi-bazouks_,[104] Circassians and
Kurds were incapable of knowing the difference between an Armenian and
a Russian, between a Greek and a Bulgarian, it was enough that all of
them went under the name “Christian.” It was their frequent utterance,
“_Ghiaurlari kesmeli_, the infidels must be killed.” Even when the
government had no war whatever there was no safety for the Christian;
how much less could any tranquillity now be expected. The mountains
especially were infested by those who deserted the army, and the
highway robbers were at the fullest exercise of their predatory powers.
Who suffered the worst, served the most, and received nothing in
Asiatic Turkey? The Armenians. The Turkish troops, by all means, would
avoid on their way to the battle-field lodging at a Turkish, but always
at an Armenian village, where even the most insignificant soldier was a
despot. He must have everything he wished for nothing, and not depart
in peace, but give some trouble to his Christian host. The writer, who
was not very far from the battle-field, being on the main road leading
to it, has seen these things with his own eyes. He may, therefore, say
with perfect truthfulness, that these soldiers did not leave out from
the category of their deeds anything evil, but the good only.
“Turkey bears a striking resemblance to the infernal regions, which
good George Herbert said are paved with broken promises; her conduct
in this war has been marked by the vilest crimes of which a nation can
be guilty. She has not only committed the crime of arming and letting
loose bands of undisciplined, fanatic robbers, whose passions, fed by
the religious exhortations of their bigoted priest, and strengthened
by the proclamation of the Sheikh-ul-Islam, have led, as _the Porte
knew full well and firmly intended that they should lead, to the
brutal massacre of the survivors of the Bulgarian rebellion and the
cold blooded murders of the inoffensive Christians in Armenia_.”[105]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account