Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic daysGabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
History
Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic days
Gabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
Armenia; Armenian question
“The crime at Sassoun lies primarily at the door of England. It is
one of the many disastrous results of that ‘peace with honor’ which
the English government, represented by Lord Beaconsfield, claimed to
have brought back from Berlin in 1878. Why was it that the Armenians
at Sassoun were left as sheep before the butcher? Why was it that the
sultan and his pashas felt themselves perfectly free to issue what
order they pleased for the massacre of the poor Armenians? The answer
is, unfortunately, only too simple. It is because England, at the
Berlin Congress, and England alone--for none of the other powers took
any interest in the matter--destroyed the security which Russia had
extorted from the Turkish government at San Stefano, and substituted
for the sterling guarantee of Russia the worthless paper money of
Ottoman promises.”[134]
The Sultan publicly endorsed the massacre and decorated Zeki Pasha, the
commander of the Fourth Army Corps, and sent four flags to the Kurdish
cavalry regiments.
Well said a prominent American: “The sultan’s act is a sort of insolent
challenge to Christendom.” Why should he not challenge Christendom?
There were some so-called Christian rulers back of him. Though the
civilized world was filled with righteous indignation at the cruelty
and insolence of the successor of Mohammed, yet he was only true to the
teaching and example of the prophet in thus violating all the laws of
civilization and humanity.
It is the characteristic of the Armenian mothers to teach their
children to cling to the religion of Christ, let come what may. And it
is due to this fact that the Armenian nation, after having undergone
fifteen centuries of persecution for their faith, still exists as
a Christian people. “The permanence of the Armenian race has been
ascribed to the virtue of their women and exceptional purity and
stability of their family life.”
The Turkish government, as might have been expected, first tried to
conceal the facts or even admit the occurrence of such a massacre.
However, under some pressure from the British ambassador, she made the
following report:
Constantinople, November 16, 1894--“The Porte has issued an account of
the last Armenian troubles in Sassoun district. The responsibility is
laid upon the Kurdish brigands, who murdered a Mussulman and committed
many other excesses. The Turkish troops called to Sassoun are said to
have restored order and protected all law-abiding persons.”
But when Sir Phillip Currie sent Mr. Hallward’s (British vice-consul
at Van) report of the massacre to the Porte, the Turkish minister
positively denied the facts, asserting that Mr. Hallward’s report was
untrue. The Porte further “stated outright, that he (Mr. Hallward) had
encouraged the Armenians to revolt.” Another report received from a
Turkish official source was “that at Sassoun all the Armenians fell in
open combat. The troops killed two thousand of them.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account