Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic daysGabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
History
Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic days
Gabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
Armenia; Armenian question
“Turkish Commission was appointed to inquire into occurrences which
took place at Sassoun in the autumn of 1894, when in the massacre in
which Turkish soldiers took part, twenty-seven Christian villages were
destroyed and thousands of Armenians were murdered. Delegates from
the English, French, and Russian consulates were appointed to attend
the Commission. At the second sitting held at Moosh, on January 26,
1895, they made what according to European ideas of justice was the
natural request that the commissioners, before inquiring into any
other matter, should take evidence as to the massacre of Armenians
by Turks. The commissioners (Turkish) however alleged that according
to their instructions from the Porte they were only to inquire “into
the criminal proceeding of the Armenian brigands,” they denied that
there had been any massacre of Armenians, and rejected the request
of the delegates. The commission sat from January 24 to July 21 at
Moosh. Some fifteen to thirty miles from the seat of the massacre,
and held one hundred and eight sittings. They declined to listen to
the Christian witnesses brought forward by the delegates and would
only accept the testimony of Turks, who had been carefully instructed
to give such evidence as would prove that the Armenians were alone
to blame. Witnesses who ventured to give evidence in favor of the
Armenians atoned for their rashness by immediate imprisonment. The
consular delegates at last refused to have anything more to do with
this farce; they therefore went to Sassoun, and by evidence there
obtained established the terrible facts and the innocence of the
peaceful Armenian population.”[140]
FOOTNOTES:
[132] Genesis 14:14.
[133] Greene, “The Armenian Crisis in Turkey,” pp. 17-24. (See fuller
accounts.) Published by Putnam and Sons, N. Y. and London.
[134] _The Westminster Gazette_, December 12, 1894, reprinted in the
_Armenia_, London, Jan., 1895.
[135] Norman, “Armenia and the Campaign of 1877,” p. 378.
[136] Bryce, “Transcaucasia and Ararat,” p. 522, 4th ed.
[137] _The London Times_, Weekly Edition, Jan. 14, 1895.
[138] Greene, “The Armenian Crisis in Turkey,” pp. 129, 130. (See the
entire address quoted by Greene.)
[139] _Blue-Book_, Turkey, No. 1, 1895, p. 206.
[140] Lepsius, “Armenia and Europe,” published in Berlin, 1896. I quote
from _The New Armenia_, reprinted June 15, 1916.
XV
THE MASSACRE OF 1895-6
“We must beg the reader of the following statements to remember
that the Armenian massacres, in which 100,000 innocent people have
perished, were directed against a peaceful and defenceless nation.--J.
Lepsius.”
While the investigating commission was carrying on its work in the
usual Turkish fashion, the British, French, and Russian governments
drew out a scheme of reforms for Armenia and submitted it to the Porte
through their ambassadors at Constantinople on May 11, 1895.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account