Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic daysGabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
History
Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic days
Gabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
Armenia; Armenian question
[142] _The Public Ledger_ (Philadelphia), Feb. 17, 1896, had the
following editorial comment on a local Turkish official report: “What
purports to be an official list of Turkish outrages in the Province
of Harpoot and some of the neighboring villages, prepared by a local
Turkish authority, is published. The total number killed is given as
39,234, and the number of destitute as 94,770. The account is somewhat
mysterious, as it does not show for what purpose it was made, nor does
the report state how a matter, usually so jealously guarded, came
to be made public, but it is _authoritative_, and the details are
more sickening than the bare aggregate, as they show the number of
persons burned to death; the number who perished from hunger and cold;
the number of women outraged; the number of forcible conversions to
Islam; the number forcibly married to Moslems, etc. It is a chapter
more worthy of the Dark Ages than modern civilization, but modern
civilization does not seem able to prevent its repetition at the
pleasure of the Turk.”
[143] Bliss, “Turkey and the Armenian Atrocities,” pp. 553-4.
[144] Greene, “Leavening the Levant,” p. 36.
[145] Report of Vice-Consul Fitzmaurice, Turkey, No. V., 1896.
[146] Greene, “Leavening the Levant,” pp. 177-8.
[147] Bryce, “Transcaucasia and Ararat,” p. 520, 4th edition.
[148] Washburn, “Fifty Years in Constantinople,” pp. 245-9.
[149] Andrews, “A History of All Nations,” Vol. XX, p. 341. Published
by Lea Brothers and Co., Philadelphia.
XVI
THE REVOLUTION AND MASSACRES OF ADANA, 1908-1909
Sultan Abdul Hamid’s despotism during his long and bloody reign had
alienated not only all the decent people in his realm, but even some of
the worse classes, who, for their liberal views, not for better lives,
were listed as his enemies. These were not Turks by descent, neither
Mohammedans by choice, but being the children of renegades, whose
forefathers professed themselves Mohammedans in order to save their
lives, their honor, and their property. Thus these European Mohammedans
were largely of Christian extract, and naturally had better chances to
learn from the Western nations, especially the army officers, some of
whom had been educated in military schools in Europe. Others, who were
known and dogged by the numerous spies of Abdul Hamid, fled the country
into Europe, and in Paris and other places, carried on a revolutionary
propaganda.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account