Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic daysGabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
History
Armenia, a martyr nation: A historical sketch of the Armenian people from traditional times to the present tragic days
Gabrielian, Mugurdich Chojhauji
Armenia; Armenian question
“They are managed by two men, who stand upright in them, each plying
an oar, one pulling and the other pushing. The boats are of various
sizes, some larger, some smaller; the biggest reach as high as five
thousand talents burthen. Each vessel has a live ass on board; those
of larger size have more than one. When they reach Babylon the cargo
is landed and offered for sale, after which the men break up their
boats, sell the straw and frames, and, loading their asses with the
skins, set off on their way back to Armenia. The current is too strong
to allow a boat to return upstream, for which reason they make their
boats of skin rather than wood. On their return to Armenia they build
fresh boats for the next voyage.”[73]
The prophet Ezekiel, more than a hundred and fifty years before the
time of Herodotus, in his enumeration of the ancient merchant nations
who were engaged in mercantile pursuits with the Phœnicians in the
markets of Tyre, speaks of the Armenians under the popular appellation
of “the house of Togarmah.” “They of the house of Togarmah traded in
thy fairs with horses and horsemen and mules.”[74]
The descendants of Togarmah, on account of their ingenuity and
intelligence, have accumulated great wealth, and demanded, by fitness,
from the indolent Turk, many high trusts in the government and its
affairs, but by the jealousy, cruelty, and cupidity of the latter many
of them have been precipitated from their elevated state and prosperity
into terrible misery, often ending in execution.
“The most remarkable circumstance is that these Armenians who have
undergone execution have the modes of their death commemorated on
their sepulchres by the effigies of men being hung, strangled or
beheaded. In explanation it is stated that having become wealthy by
their industry, they suffered as victims to the cupidity of former
governments, not as criminals; and hence their ignominious death was
really honorable to them and worthy of a memorial. An inscription on
one of the tombs of this class is as follows:
“You see my place of burial here in this verdant field,
I give my goods to the robber,
My soul to the regions of death;
The world I leave to God,
And my blood I shed in the Holy Spirit.
You who meet my tomb,
Say for me
‘Lord, I have sinned.’
1197.”[75]
Sultan Mohammed II after he made Constantinople his capital appointed
Bishop Onaghim, of Brousa, patriarch over the Armenians in his
dominions in 1461, as the head of his people with certain privileges.
This custom of appointing the patriarchs by the Sultans continued for
a long time. But it did not prove to be the popular way, on account
of abuses of procuring the offices, and unqualified persons often
obtaining the appointment by the influence of their friends. The
nation, therefore, obtained the right from the Porte to choose her own
patriarch by suffrage. The appointment, however, had to be ratified by
the Sultan of Turkey.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account