Arminell: A Social Romance, Vol. 1Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
General
Arminell: A Social Romance, Vol. 1
Baring-Gould, S. (Sabine)
English fiction -- 19th century
“O, bother the garden party,” said his lordship wearily. “You and I
hardly ever get a quiet evening together, so now that we have one, let
us forget the world outside and some of these exacting and embarrassing
duties we owe it. Really, I envy those who, belonging to a less
conspicuous sphere, have their cosy evenings at home, their privacy and
peaceful joys. We are forced to live in publicity, we have to fill our
house with guests, lay ourselves out to entertain them, keep a French
cook for them—I am sure boiled mutton and caper sauce would content
me,—stock our cellars for them, keep hunters and preserve the game for
them. Upon my word, Julia, we are not suffered to live for ourselves. A
selfish existence is with us impossible. No monks or nuns ever gave up
half so much, and lived so completely for others, continually
sacrificing their own pleasures, leisure, thoughts, time, to others,—as
we, the British aristocracy.”
“You are out of spirits to-night, Lamerton.” His wife retained his hand,
and pressed it.
“Then,” continued his lordship, following his own train of thought, and
not answering his wife’s remark, perhaps because he did not hear it, so
full was his mind of the topic then uppermost in it, “then, Julia,
consider—we are mounted specimens; like those unfortunate worms in sour
paste, and monsters in a drop of dirty water, we were shown by
lime-light and a magnifying glass the other evening at the National
School, projected on a white sheet. The whole room was crowded, and the
bumpkins in the place sat gazing as the lecturer pointed to the
wriggling creatures, named each in succession, and described it. What
must have been the discomfort to those animals, if in any degree
sensitive, to be exposed, stared at, glared through, commented on!
and—consider—the lecturer may have misinterpreted them, because
misunderstanding them, and they listened to it all, squirmed a little
more painfully, but were incapable of setting him to rights. The German
princes are entitled _durch-laucht_, that is, ‘Transparencies;’ and
quite right. We also are transparencies, we worms of the aristocracy,
monsters of privilege, held up before the public eye, magnified,
projected on newspaper sheets, characterised sometimes aright, more
often wrongly, forced to have every nerve in our system, every pulsation
in our blood, every motion in our brains, every moment in our lives, and
every writhe of our bodies and spasm of our hearts commented on by the
vulgar, and brutally misunderstood. It is rather hard on us, Julia.
There are other worms in the sour paste of life, other monsters in the
drop of dirty water we call Society, who are at liberty to turn about,
and stretch themselves, bound or coil as they list; only we—we must live
and wriggle between two plates of glass, illuminated and made
translucent by the most powerful known light, denied that privilege
which belongs to the humble—opacity.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account