Ashcliffe Hall: A tale of the last centuryHolt, Emily Sarah
General
Ashcliffe Hall: A tale of the last century
Holt, Emily Sarah
England -- Social life and customs -- 18th century -- Fiction; Historical fiction; Religious fiction
"I don't know, indeed, Mother," replied Celia. "I expected him ere
now. I know not what is keeping him. Surely he will be here before
summer!"
Edward Ingram was not at Ashcliffe before summer.
The summer passed, and he did not come. The winter passed, and he
did not come. Nay, the whole spring, and summer, and autumn, and
winter of another year passed, and the third summer, of 1714, was
fading into autumn--still Edward did not come.
But when the dusk was gathering on the 5th of August in that year, a
horseman galloped into Ashcliffe village with news which he was
carrying post-haste to Tavistock and Launceston--news which blanched
in my a cheek and set many a man looking to his aims--which called
forth muffled peals from the church-towers, and draped pulpits and
pews in mourning, and was received with sadness and alarm in
well-nigh every English home. For the one thread was snapped on
which England's peace had hung--the one barrier standing between
England and anarchy was broken. The last Stuart whom the nation
acknowledged lay dead in Kensington Palace.
So long as Queen Anne lived, the embers of discord had been only
smouldering. The Jacobites felt a half-satisfaction in the thought
that the old line still held the sceptre; the Whigs rejoiced in their
Whig and Protestant Queen. Not that the private political views of
the Queen were very Whiggish ones. On the contrary, granted one
thing--her own personal rule--she was at heart a Tory. For all the
years of her reign she had been growing more and more a Tory. She
would never have abdicated the sceptre; but very little indeed was
wanted to make her say, when the cold grasp of the Angel of Death was
laid upon her, "Let my brother succeed me." Such a speech would have
given the Jacobites immense vantage-ground. For in 1714 the State
was still the Sovereign, and "_La Royne le veut_" was sterling yet in
England. This the partisans of the exiled family knew well; and to
their very utmost, through their trusted agents, of whom Abigail Lady
Masham was the chief, they strove to induce the Queen to utter such
words. Her decease now was the signal for the division of the
country into two sharply-defined parties. The Tories strove for King
James, triennial Parliaments, removal of Popish disabilities, peace
with France, free trade, and repeal of the union with Scotland. The
Whigs battled as fiercely for King George, septennial Parliaments,
Test and Corporation Acts, war with France, protection, and
centralization.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account