The statistics collected from the most reliable sources, and here presented, may be regarded as a fair representation of the general average of loss by the different modes of practice. In a report now before us, it is stated, "The average proportion of deaths in Paris from cholera, treated under the allopathic practice, was 49 per cent.; while that under the homoeopathic was only 7-1/4 per cent." "In Vienna, (Aus.,) under the former, the deaths are reported at 31 per cent.; while under the latter it was only 8 per cent. In Bordeaux, death occurred under allopathic treatment at the rate of 67 per cent., and under homoeopathic, 17 per cent. only. The general average in the places last mentioned will stand thus: Allopathic, 49 per cent.; homoeopathic, 10-1/4 per cent." The record of mortality in twenty-one hospitals in Europe shows the average deaths under allopathic treatment to be 65-1/8 per cent., while in ten hospitals where the cholera patients were under homoeopathic treatment, the average deaths from that disease was 11-3/4 only. In a report "published by the authorities of Pischnowitz (in Prussia), it will be seen that 680 cases were treated as follows: 278 treated homoeopathically, of which 27 died; 381 treated allopathically, of which 102 died." In St. Louis, during the prevalence of cholera in 1849, the number treated by three homoeopathic doctors, to July 13th, was 1,567, of which 51 died--a loss of 3-1/4 per cent. In Cincinnati, during the month of May, there were treated by the eclectic physicians 330 cases of cholera and 198 cases of cholerine, of which only five died. In the same city, during the same time, there were treated by the allopathic physicians 432 cases of cholera, of which 116 died.