Aspects of scienceSullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Philosophy
Aspects of science
Sullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
English essays -- 20th century; Science
The mind had barely become accustomed to the new assumptions before it
was again profoundly disturbed by the publication of Planck’s Quantum
Theory. The theory, which was invented to explain certain radiation
phenomena, asserted, briefly, that energy was atomic. One’s most
intimate assumptions were disturbed. Men of science are not usually
accustomed to philosophic exercises, and the idea that energy, which
they regarded as necessarily continuous, had an atomic structure seemed
at first almost meaningless. If we consider, for instance, the energy
possessed by a moving body, it seems natural to suppose that this
energy can be increased or diminished in a continuous manner; the idea
that its energy can only increase or decrease by finite jumps was a
very strange idea, and led again to a scrutiny of assumptions which
had appeared fundamental in science. Here, again, objections to the
new theory were sometimes the outcome purely of mental inertia, of an
inability to examine and discard a way of thinking which seemed almost
a necessary consequence of the structure of the mind. The last great
_bouleversement_ of one’s fundamental assumptions has been, of
course, Einstein’s generalised theory of relativity. Here we are asked
to revise our most deep-rooted assumptions--so deep-rooted that we are,
for the most part, unconscious of them--our assumptions regarding space
and time.
It is this thorough overhauling of primary assumptions which
distinguishes the modern progress in physics from all the progress of
the Victorian age. Physics has not merely been extended, it has become
a radically new thing, and there are very good reasons for supposing
that it is going to change still more. A certain sense of unknown
possibilities is therefore natural, even if it be the product merely of
bewilderment. The total effect of the new ideas is to make the universe
of physics less objective; to an unsuspected extent this indifferent
universe, with its iron laws, is a product of our own minds. To some
extent this fact was always recognised, particularly by the Continental
physicists, but as a general persuasion it is comparatively recent.
We cannot escape the structure of our own minds, it is true, but we
do not yet know what that structure is; we do not know what barriers
are breakable; we do not know what thoughts are thinkable by man. A
universe in whose construction so plastic and mysterious an entity as
the mind of man collaborates, may very well hold great surprises.
THE HOPE OF SCIENCE
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account