Aspects of scienceSullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
Philosophy
Aspects of science
Sullivan, J. W. N. (John William Navin)
English essays -- 20th century; Science
sensations he will single some out for attention and neglect the rest.
He singles out those which, for some reason or another, interest him
most. It may quite easily happen, therefore, that the sensations most
relevant to the inquiry in hand have been neglected. They have been
filtered, as it were, through the medium of the witness’s interest;
and it is often the case that his interest has not been excited by the
sensations most pertinent to the subsequent inquiry. It is on this fact
that conjurers very largely depend for their success. The attention
of the audience is distracted; they are invited to dismiss certain
sensations as being of no importance, and, in general, it is remarkably
easy to ensure this distraction of attention. Dr. Hodgson’s case of the
English officer and the Hindu juggler well illustrates this point:
Referring to the movements of the coins, he said that he had taken a
coin from his own pocket and placed it on the ground himself, yet
that this coin had indulged in the same freaks as the other coins.
His wife ventured to suggest that the juggler had taken the coin and
placed it on the ground, but the officer was emphatic in repeating
his statement, and appealed to me for confirmation. He was, however,
mistaken. I had watched the transaction with special curiosity, as I
knew what was necessary for the performance of the trick. The officer
had apparently intended to place the coin upon the ground himself, but
as he was doing so the juggler leant slightly forward, dexterously and
in a most unobtrusive manner received the coin from the fingers of the
officer, as the latter was stooping down, and laid it close to the
others. If the juggler had not thus taken the coin, but had allowed
the officer himself to place it on the ground, the trick, as actually
performed, would have been frustrated.
Now I think it highly improbable that the movement of the juggler
entirely escaped the perception of the officer; highly improbable,
that is to say, that the officer was absolutely unaware of the
juggler’s action at the moment of its happening; but I suppose that,
although an impression was made on his consciousness, it was so slight
as to be speedily effaced by the officer’s _imagination_ of
himself as stooping and placing the coin upon the ground.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account