Assassination of Lincoln: a History of the Great Conspiracy: Trial of the Conspirators by a Military Commission, and a Review of the Trial of John H. SurrattHarris, T. M. (Thomas Mealey)
History
Assassination of Lincoln: a History of the Great Conspiracy: Trial of the Conspirators by a Military Commission, and a Review of the Trial of John H. Surratt
Harris, T. M. (Thomas Mealey)
Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 -- Assassination; Surratt, John H. (John Harrison), 1844-1916
The Constitution does not permit this government to prosecute a
war as an uncivilized and barbarous people. As war is required
by the frame-work of our government to be prosecuted according
to the known usages of war among the civilized nations of the
earth, it is important to understand what are the obligations,
duties, and responsibilities imposed by war upon the military.
Congress, not having defined, as under the Constitution it
might have done, the laws of war, we must look to the usage
of nations to ascertain the powers conferred in war, on whom
the exercise of these powers devolve, over whom, and to what
extent do these powers reach, and in how far the citizen and
the soldier are bound by the legitimate use thereof. The power
conferred by war is, of course, adequate to the end to be
accomplished, and not greater than what is necessary to be
accomplished. The law of war, like every other code of laws,
declares what shall not be done, and does not say what may be
done.
The legitimate use of the great power of war, or rather the
prohibitions upon the use of that power, increase or diminish
as the necessity of the case demands. When a city is besieged
and hard pressed the commander may exert an authority over the
non-combatants which he may not when no enemy is near. All wars
against a domestic enemy, or to repel invasions, are prosecuted
to preserve the government. If the invading force can be
overcome by the ordinary civil police of a country, it should
be done without bringing upon the country the terrible scourge
of war; if a commotion or insurrection can be put down by the
ordinary process of law, the military should not be called out.
A defensive foreign war is declared and carried on because the
civil police is inadequate to repel it; a civil war is waged
because the laws cannot be peacefully enforced by the ordinary
tribunals of the country through civil process and by civil
officers. Because of the utter inability to keep the peace and
maintain order by customary officers and agencies in time of
peace, armies are organized and put into the field. They are
called out and invested with the powers of war to prevent total
anarchy and to preserve the government.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account