Assassination of Lincoln: a History of the Great Conspiracy: Trial of the Conspirators by a Military Commission, and a Review of the Trial of John H. SurrattHarris, T. M. (Thomas Mealey)
History
Assassination of Lincoln: a History of the Great Conspiracy: Trial of the Conspirators by a Military Commission, and a Review of the Trial of John H. Surratt
Harris, T. M. (Thomas Mealey)
Lincoln, Abraham, 1809-1865 -- Assassination; Surratt, John H. (John Harrison), 1844-1916
In speaking upon the subject of banditti, Patrick Henry said
in the Virginia Convention: "The honorable gentleman has
given you an elaborate account of what he judges tyrannical
legislation, and an _ex-post facto_ law (in the case of Josiah
Philips); he has misinterpreted the facts. That man was
not executed by a tyrannical stroke of power, nor was he a
Socrates; he was a fugitive murderer and an outlaw; a man who
commanded an _infamous banditti_, and _at a time when the war
was at the most perilous stage_ he committed the most cruel
and shocking barbarities; he was an enemy to the human name.
Those who declare war against the human race may be struck
out of existence as soon as apprehended. He was not executed
according to those beautiful legal ceremonies which are pointed
out by the law in criminal cases. The enormity of his crime
did not entitle him to it. I am truly a friend to legal forms
and methods; but, sir, the occasion warranted the measure. A
pirate, an outlaw, or a common enemy to all mankind may be
put to death at any time. It is justified by the law of war
and of nations." No reader, not to say student, of the law of
nations can doubt that Mr. Wheaton and Mr. Henry have fairly
stated the laws of war. Let it be constantly borne in mind that
they are talking of the law in a state of war. These banditti
that spring up in time of war are respecters of no law, human
or divine, of peace or of war, are _hostes humani generis_,
and may be hunted down like wolves. Thoroughly desperate and
perfectly lawless, no man can be required to peril his life in
venturing to take them prisoners; as prisoners no trust can
be reposed in them. But they are occasionally made prisoners.
Being prisoners, what is to be done with them? If they are
public enemies, assuming and exercising the right to kill, and
are not regularly authorized to do so, they must be apprehended
and dealt with by the military. No man can doubt the right
and duty of the military to make prisoners of them, and being
public enemies it is the duty of the military to punish them
for any infractions of the laws of war.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account