Science fiction -- Periodicals; Science fiction, American -- Periodicals
I have just finished reading your magazine. I came close to
not buying it, being not overly prosperous, but decided to
take a chance when I saw you had a dimensional story by
Murray Leinster. That story was up to expectations. The
others were down to expectations.
If you want me to choose your magazine to spend my reading
allowance on, have more stories by Leinster, Starzl, Breuer
and Wells. It may take a little more effort, but it's worth
it. Sax Rohmer is good on science stuff, too.
Before you print any more undersea stories have a diver look
at them. You tell about standing at the bottom of the ocean
and seeing the submarine "not more than a quarter of a mile
away." Ha-ha! [No fair, that ha-ha! For the story says,
quoted exactly: "... there gleamed the reassuring LIGHTS of
the Nereid, not a quarter of a mile away." Probably, intense
searchlight beams could be seen that far.--Ed.] You couldn't
see it if you stood more than ten feet away. I'm not trying
to be critical, but you should be more careful.--Myron
Higgins, 524 West 100th St., New York City.
_We Never Will_
Dear Editor:
I have been an enthusiastic reader of Astounding Stories
since it was founded, and I think it about time that I
voiced my opinion of your great magazine.
Taking all in all it's a vow, but of course it could be
made better by having a quarterly, which I am sure would go
over big.
Wesso is great, so why not have all the illustrations by
him?
Your authors are also great. Nearly every story I have read
was perfect, and whatever you do don't lose R. F. Starzl.
His ideas are very good, as illustrated in "The Planet of
Dread."
There is only one more thing I would like to ask of you, and
that is the reason why I write. Please don't spoil the
magazine by endeavoring to please a very small minority by
putting in unnecessary scientific explanations. The reason
why I like your magazine so much is because of the fact that
it is unique in that respect. I have read a few stories in
other scientific magazines and found that they contained too
much explanation. I hope for the benefit of other Readers
and myself that you will not change the stories by adding
too much explanation.
In the coming year I wish you all possible success.--John
Sheehan, 32 Elm St., Cambridge, Mass.
_This and That_
Dear Editor:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account