Astounding Stories of Super-Science, October, 1930Various
Science
Astounding Stories of Super-Science, October, 1930
Various
Science fiction -- Periodicals; Science fiction, American -- Periodicals
I received the latest issue of Astounding Stories, and in
looking it through I noticed your comments on reprints. Your
argument can easily be shot full of holes, and that's what I
intend to do.
First: Those stories being printed now are far inferior to
the reprints. Even your best stories, such as "Murder
Madness" and "Brigands of the Moon," cannot be compared with
such stories as "Station X," "The Moon Pool," "The Metal
Monster," or "The Columbus of Space" and "The Second
Deluge."
Second: The Saturday Evening Post cannot be compared with
our magazine, for all the stories printed in it can be
obtained in book form, while the scientific novels are
almost all out of print.
Third: There is surely more than one out of a hundred who
haven't read the reprints. Just because some have read them
is no reason that they don't want them. I know, for I have a
large library of reprints and have read, and own, almost
every one of them, yet I would gladly see them again.
Fourth: The authors need not starve. You could easily devote
just a small space for reprints, and many would pay
twenty-five cents for the magazine.
The fairest and most American idea would be to let your
readers vote for this. Here is vote No. 1 for
reprints.--Woodrow Gelman, 1603 President St., Brooklyn, N. Y.
_Praise and Suggestions_
Dear Editor:
I have just finished the July issue of Astounding Stories
and classify the stories as follows:
"Beyond the Heaviside Layer," good; "Earth, the Marauder,"
excellent, best in issue; "From an Amber Block," fairly
good; "The Terror of Air-Level Six," very good; "The
Forgotten Planet," excellent; "The Power and the Glory,"
good; "Murder Madness," very good, but not so much so as
preceding chapters.
Now for a few criticisms:
1. Your magazine (or should I say "our" magazine?) is too
small. Of course, it would be a radical change to make it
larger, but, like others, I think in the end you would gain
rather than lose by it. Most small magazines are cheap
affairs, and to have Astounding Stories small brands it as a
cheap type of magazine. Small magazines are more likely to
be hidden on the newsstands by larger ones, and in most
stores the large magazines have the more advantageous
positions.
2. The edges of your pages are uneven. You look in the index
and find an interesting story is on, for example, page 56.
You skim the pages to find it, and from page 43 you find
yourself suddenly at page 79. Make the paper more even,
please.
3. Don't have advertisements before the stories. Have them
in the rear.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account