Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural TheologyWhewell, William
Religion
Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology
Whewell, William
Astronomy; Cosmic physics; Natural theology
4. There is still one reflexion which ought not to be omitted.
All the changes of the weather, even the most violent tempests
and torrents of rain, may be considered as oscillations about the
mean or average condition belonging to each place. All these
oscillations are limited and transient; the storm spends its fury,
the inundation passes off, the sky clears, the calmer course of
nature succeeds. In the forces which produce this derangement,
there is a provision for making it short and moderate. The
oscillation stops of itself, like the rolling of a ship, when
no longer impelled by the wind. Now, why should this be so? Why
should the oscillations, produced by the conflict of so many laws,
seemingly quite unconnected with each other, be of this converging
and subsiding character? Would it be so under all arrangements? Is
it a matter of mechanical necessity that disturbance must end in
the restoration of the medium condition? By no means. There may
be an utter subversion of the equilibrium. The ship may roll too
far, and may _capsize_. The oscillations may go on, becoming larger
and larger, till all trace of the original condition is lost; till
new forces of inequality and disturbance are brought into play;
and disorder and irregularity may succeed, without apparent limit
or check in its own nature, like the spread of a conflagration in
a city. This is a possibility in any combination of mechanical
forces; why does it not happen in the one now before us? By what
good fortune are the powers of heat, of water, of steam, of air,
the effects of the earth’s annual and diurnal motions, and probably
other causes, so adjusted, that through all their struggles the
elemental world goes on, upon the whole, so quietly and steadily?
Why is the whole fabric of the weather never utterly deranged, its
balance lost irrecoverably? Why is there not an eternal conflict,
such as the poets imagine to take place in their chaos?
“For Hot, Cold, Moist, and Dry, four champions fierce,
Strive here for mastery, and to battle bring
Their embryon atoms:--
to whom these most adhere,
He rules _a moment_: Chaos umpire sits,
And by decision more embroils the fray.”--_Par. Lost._ b. ii.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account