Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematicsFerguson, James
Science
Astronomy Explained Upon Sir Isaac Newton's Principles: And made easy to those who have not studied mathematics
Ferguson, James
Astronomy -- Early works to 1800
185. We daily observe, that the objects which appear most distinct are
generally those which are nearest to us; and consequently, when we have
nothing but our imagination to assist us in estimating of distances,
bright objects seem nearer to us than those which are less bright, or
than the same objects do when they appear less bright and worse defined,
even though their distance in both cases be the same. And as in both
cases they are seen under the same angle[44], our imagination naturally
suggests an idea of a greater distance between us and those objects
which appear fainter and worse defined than those which appear brighter
under the same Angles; especially if they be such objects as we were
never near to, and of whose real Magnitudes we can be no judges by
sight.
[Sidenote: Nor always of those which are accessible.]
186. But, it is not only in judging of the different apparent Magnitudes
of the same objects, which are better or worse defined by their being
more or less bright, that we may be deceived: for we may make a wrong
conclusion even when we view them under equal degrees of brightness, and
under equal Angles; although they be objects whose bulks we are
generally acquainted with, such as houses or trees: for proof of which,
the two following instances may suffice.
[Sidenote: The reason assigned.
PLATE II.]
First, When a house is seen over a very broad river by a person standing
on low ground, who sees nothing of the river, nor knows of it
beforehand; the breadth of the river being hid from him, because the
banks seem contiguous, he loses the idea of a distance equal to that
breadth; and the house seems small, because he refers it to a less
distance than it really is at. But, if he goes to a place from which the
river and interjacent ground can be seen, though no farther from the
house, he then perceives the house to be at a greater distance than he
imagined; and therefore fancies it to be bigger than he did at first;
although in both cases it appears under the same Angle, and consequently
makes no bigger picture on the retina of his eye in the latter case than
it did in the former. Many have been deceived, by taking a red coat of
arms, fixed upon the iron gate in _Clare-Hall_ walks at _Cambridge_, for
a brick house at a much greater distance[45].
[Sidenote: Fig. XII.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account