Astronomy: The Science of the Heavenly BodiesTodd, David P. (David Peck)
History
Astronomy: The Science of the Heavenly Bodies
Todd, David P. (David Peck)
Astronomy
This again is a question to which the astronomer of the present day can
give no certain answer. So immensely distant are even the nearest of
these multitudinous bodies that no telescope can ever be built large
enough or powerful enough to reveal a dark planet as large as Jupiter,
alongside even the nearest fixed star. Whatever may be the process of
stellar evolution, there doubtless is an era of many hundreds of
millions of years in the life of a star when it is passing through a
planet-maintaining stage. This would likely depend upon spectral type,
or to be indicated by it; and as about half of the stars are of the
solar type, it would be a reasonable inference that at least half of the
stars may have planets tributary to them.
In such a case, the chances must be overwhelmingly in favor of vast
numbers of the planets of other stellar systems being favorably
circumstanced as to heat and moisture for the maintenance of life at the
present time. That is, they are habitable, and if habitable, then
thousands of them are no doubt inhabited now. But astronomers know
absolutely nothing about this question, nor are they able to conceive at
present any way that may lead them to any definite knowledge of it.
There is, indeed, one piece of quasi-evidence which might reasonably be
interpreted as implying that it is more likely that the stars are not
attended by families of planets than that they are.
CHAPTER XXXV
THE LITTLE PLANETS
Along toward the end of the eighteenth century and the beginning of the
nineteenth, astronomers were leading a quiet unexcited life. Sir William
Herschel had been knighted by King George for his discovery of the outer
planet Uranus, and practically everything seemed to be known and
discovered in the solar system with a single exception. Between Mars and
Jupiter there existed an obvious gap in the planetary brotherhood.
Could it be possible that some time in the remote cosmic past a planet
had actually existed there, and that some celestial cataclysm had blown
it to fragments? If so, would they still be traveling round the sun as
individual small planets? And might it not be possible to discover some
of them among the faint stars that make up the belt of the zodiac in
which all the other planets travel?
So interesting was this question that the first international
association of astronomers banded themselves together to carry on a
systematic search round the entire zodiacal heavens in the faint hope of
detecting possible fragments of the original planet of mere hypothesis.
The astronomers of that day placed much reliance on what is known as
Bode's law--not a law at all, but a mere arithmetical succession of
numbers which represented very well the relative distances of all the
planets from the sun. And the distance of the newly found Uranus fitted
in so well with this law that the utter absence of a planet in the gap
between Mars and Jupiter became very strongly marked.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account