Astronomy: The Science of the Heavenly BodiesTodd, David P. (David Peck)
History
Astronomy: The Science of the Heavenly Bodies
Todd, David P. (David Peck)
Astronomy
If, as is likely, some of the smallest asteroids are not more than ten
miles in diameter, their gravity must be so feeble a force that it might
be overcome by a stone thrown from the hand. There is no reliable
evidence that any of the asteroids are surrounded by atmospheric gases
of any sort. Probably they are for the most part spherical in form,
although there is very reliable evidence that a few of the asteroids,
being variable in the amount of sunlight that they reflect, are
irregular in form, mere angular masses perhaps.
The network of orbits of the asteroids is inconceivable complicated.
Nevertheless, there is a wide variation in their average distance from
the sun, and their periods of traveling round him vary in a similar
manner, the shortest being only about three years. While the longest is
nearly nine years in duration, the average of all their periods is a
little over four years. The gap in the zone of asteroids, at a distance
from the sun equal to about five-eighths that of Jupiter, is due to the
excessive disturbing action of Jupiter, whose periodic time is just
twice as long as that of a theoretical planet at this distance.
The average inclination of their orbits to the plane of the ecliptic is
not far from 8 degrees. But the orbit of Pallas, for example, is
inclined 35 degrees, and the eccentricities of the asteroid orbits are
equally erratic and excessive. Both eccentricity and inclination of
orbit at times suggest a possible relation to cometary orbits, but
nothing has ever been definitely made out connecting asteroids and
comets in a related origin.
No comprehensive theory of the origin of the asteroid group has yet been
propounded that has met with universal acceptance. According to the
nebular hypothesis the original gaseous material, which should have been
so concentrated as to form a planet of ordinary type, has in the case of
the asteroids collected into a multitude of small masses instead of
simply one. That there is a sound physical reason for this can hardly be
denied. According to the Laplacian hypothesis, the nearness of the huge
planetary mass of Jupiter just beyond their orbits produced violent
perturbations which caused the original ring of gaseous material to
collect into fragmentary masses instead of one considerable planet. The
theory of a century ago that an original great planet was shattered by
internal explosive forces is no longer regarded as tenable.
To astronomers engaged upon investigation of distances in the solar
system, the asteroid group has proved very useful. The late Sir David
Gill employed a number of them in a geometrical research for finding the
sun's distance, and more recently the discovery of Eros (433) has made
it possible to apply a similar method for a like purpose when it
approaches nearest to the earth in 1924 and 1931. Then the distance of
Eros will be less than half that of Mars or even Venus at their nearest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account