Astronomy: The Science of the Heavenly BodiesTodd, David P. (David Peck)
History
Astronomy: The Science of the Heavenly Bodies
Todd, David P. (David Peck)
Astronomy
These stars are distant less than five parsecs (about 16 light-years)
from the sun, so they make up the closest fringe of the stellar universe
immediately surrounding our system. The large number of binary systems
is quite remarkable. Why some stars are single and others double is not
yet known. By the spectroscopic method the proportion is not so large;
Campbell finding that about one quarter of 1,600 stars examined are
spectroscopic binaries, and Frost two-fifths to a half. The exceptional
number of large velocities is very remarkable; the average transverse
motion of the nineteen stars is fifty kilometers per second, whereas
thirty is about what would have been expected.
As to star streams to which these nearest stars belong, eleven are in
Stream I and eight in Stream II, in close accord with the ratio 3:2
given by the 6,000 stars of Boss's catalogue. "We are not able," says
Eddington, "to detect any significant difference between the
luminosities, spectra, or speeds of the stars constituting the two
streams. The thorough interpenetration of the two star streams is well
illustrated, since we find even in this small volume of space that
members of both streams are mingled together in just about the average
proportion."
[Illustration: THE RING NEBULA IN _Lyra_. This is the best example
of the annular and elliptic nebulæ, which are not very abundant.
(_Photo, Mt. Wilson Solar Observatory._)]
[Illustration: THE DUMB-BELL NEBULA OF _Vulpecula_. To take the
photograph required an exposure of five hours. (_Photo, Mt.
Wilson Solar Observatory._)]
CHAPTER L
ACTUAL DIMENSIONS OF THE STARS
We have seen that the distances of the stars from the solar system are
immense beyond conception, and millions upon millions of them are
probably forever beyond our power of ascertaining by direct measurement
what their distance really is. After we had found the sun's distance and
measured the angle filled by his disk, it was easy to calculate his
actual size. This direct method, however, fails when we try to apply it
to the stars, because their distances are so vast that no star's disk
fills an angle of any appreciable size; and even if we try to get a disk
with the highest magnifying powers of a great telescope our efforts end
only in failure. There is, indeed, no instrumentally appreciable angle
to measure.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account