Astronomy: The Science of the Heavenly BodiesTodd, David P. (David Peck)
History
Astronomy: The Science of the Heavenly Bodies
Todd, David P. (David Peck)
Astronomy
Dealing with the very important question whether the two streams are
actually intermingled in space, Eddington finds them nearly at the same
mean distance and thoroughly intermingled, and there is no possible
hypothesis of Drifts I and II passing one behind the other in the same
line of sight. A third drift, to which all the Orion stars belong, is
under investigation, together with comprehensive analysis of the drifts
according to the spectral type of all the stars included.
The farther research on star-streaming is pushed, the more it becomes
evident that a third stream, called Drift O, is necessary, especially
to include B-type stars. The farther we recede from the sun, the more
this drift is in evidence. At the average distances of B-type stars, the
observed motions are almost completely represented by Drift O alone.
Halm of Cape Town concludes from recent investigations that the
double-drift phenomena (Drifts I and II) is of a distinctly _local_
character, and concerns chiefly the stars in the vicinity of the solar
system; while stars at the greatest distances from the sun belong
preeminently to Drift O.
The 60-inch reflector on Mount Wilson gathers sufficient light so that
the spectra of very faint stars can be photographed, and a discussion of
velocities derived in this manner has shown that Kapteyn's two star
streams extend into space much farther than it was possible to trace
them with the nearer stars. Star-streaming, then, may be a phenomenon of
the widest significance in reference to the entire universe.
As to the fundamental causes for the two opposite and nearly equal star
streams, it is early perhaps to even theorize upon the subject.
Eddington, however, finds a possible explanation in the spiral nebulæ,
which are so numerous as to indicate the certainty of an almost
universal law compelling matter to flow in these forms. Why it does so,
we cannot be said to know; but obviously matter is either flowing into
the nucleus from the branches of the spiral, or it is flowing out from
the nucleus into the branches. Which of the two directions does not
matter, because in either case there would be currents of matter in
opposite directions at the points where the arms merge in the central
aggregation. The currents continue through the center, because the
stars do not interfere with one another's paths. As Eddington concludes:
"There then we have an explanation of the prevalence of motions to and
fro in a particular straight line; it is the line from which the spiral
branches start out. The two star streams and the double-branched spirals
arise from the same cause."
CHAPTER LVII
THE GALAXY OR MILKY WAY
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account