P. 60. Aristodemus: Xenoph. _Memor._ i. 4.—Cinesias: Decharme, p. 135.—The Hermocopidae: Decharme, p. 152. Beloch, _Hist. of Greece_, ii. 1, p. 360, has another explanation. To my argument it is of no consequence what special motive is assigned for the crime, as long as it is a political one. P. 61. Plato on impiety: _Laws_, x. p. 886b; comp. xii. p. 967_a_. Curiously enough, the same tripartition of the wrong attitude towards the gods occurs already in the _Republic_, ii. p. 365_d_, where it is introduced incidentally as well known and a matter of course. P. 62. Euripides: _e.g._ _Hecuba_, 488; _Suppl._ 608.—Reference to Anaxagoras: _Laws_, x. p. 886_d_; to Sophistic, 889_b_. P. 65. Plato in the _Apology_: p. 19_c_.—Socrates’s _daimonion_ a proof of _asebeia_: Xenoph. _Memorab._ i. 1, 2; _Apol_. _Socr._ 12; Plato, _Apol._ p. 31_d_. P. 66. Accusation of teaching the doctrine of Anaxagoras: Plato, _Apol._ p. 26_d_; comp. Xenoph. _Memor._ i. 1, 10.—Plato’s defence of Socrates: _Apol._ p. 27_a_. P. 67. Xenophon’s defence of Socrates: _Memor._ i. 1, 2; 6 foll., 10 foll.—Teleological view of nature: Xenoph. _Memor._ i. 4; iv. 3.—On the religious standpoint of Socrates, comp. my _Udvalgte Afhandlinger_, p. 38. P. 68. Plato’s _Apology_, p. 21_d_, 23_a_ and _f_, etc.—The gods all-knowing: _Odyss._ iv. 379 and 468; comp. Nägelsbach, _Hom. Theol._ p. 18; _Nachhom. Theol._ p. 23. P. 69. The gods just: Nägelsbach, _Hom. Theol._ p. 297; _Nachhom. Theol._ p. 27. P. 71. The relation between early religious thought and Delphi has been explained correctly by Sam Wide, _Einleit. in die Altertumswissensch._, ii. p. 221; comp. also I. L. Heiberg in _Tilskueren_, 1919, ii. p. 44.—Honours shown to Pindar at Delphi: schol. Pind. ed. Drachm. i. p. 2, 14; 5, 6. Pausan, x. 24. 5. P. 72. Plato on the Delphic Oracle: _Apol._ p. 20_e_. On the following comp. I. L. Heiberg, _loc. cit._ p. 45.—Socrates on his _daimonion_: Plato, _Apol._ p. 31_c_. P. 74. Antisthenes: Ritter, _Hist. philos. Gr.__9_ 285.—On the later Cynics, especially Diogenes, see Diog. Laert. vi. 105 (the gods are in need of nothing); Julian, _Or._ vi. p. 199_b_ (Diogenes did not worship the gods). P. 75. Cyrenaics: Diog. Laert. ii. 91.—Date of Theodorus: Diog. Laert. ii. 101, 103; his book on the gods: Diog. Laert. ii. 97, Sext. Emp. _adv. math._ ix. 55; his trial: Diog. Laert. ii. 101. P. 76. Theodorus’s book used by Epicurus: Diog. Laert. ii. 97.—Zeller: _Philos. d. Griechen_, ii. 1, p. 925.—Euthyphron: see especially p. 14_b_ foll. P. 77. Criticism of Mythology in the _Republic_: ii. p. 377_b_ foll.; worship presupposed: _e.g._ iii. p. 415_e_; v. p. 459_e_, 461_a_, 468_d_, 469_a_, 470_a_; vii. p. 540_b_; reference to the Oracle: iv. p. 427_b_.—_Timaeus_: p. 40_d_ foll.—_Laws_, rules of worship: vi. p. 759_a_, vii. p. 967_a_ and elsewhere, x. p. 909_d_; capital punishment for atheists: x. p. 909_a_. Comp. above, on p. 61.