Attack of Fortified Places. Including Siege-works, Mining, and Demolitions.: Prepared for the use of the Cadets of the United States Military AcademyMercur, James
History
Attack of Fortified Places. Including Siege-works, Mining, and Demolitions.: Prepared for the use of the Cadets of the United States Military Academy
Mercur, James
Defensive (Military science); Military engineering; Offensive (Military science); Siege warfare
As different mining galleries, however, differ from each other so much
in strength to resist crushing, and as the cost of an exhaustive series
of experiments to determine their relative strength would be so great
both in time and money, but little well-established data exist upon
which to found a rule for determining the radius of rupture.
=10.= The rule deduced by Gumpertz and Lebrun, however, from
the material available at their time corresponds very nearly with
the results of later experiments and observations, and is generally
admitted as sufficiently near correct for practical use.
This rule is based upon the theory that the surface of rupture is an
oblate spheroid, (Pl. XI, Fig. 3), with its axis of revolution vertical
and its centre at the centre of the charge; the intersection with the
surface of the ground _AD_ coinciding with the edge of the crater. The
ratio between the semi-transverse axis _CF_ and the semi-conjugate
axis _CH_ of the generating ellipse of this assumed spheroid is the
same as that between the radius of explosion _CD_ and L. L. R., _CK_.
The rule is, that _the radius of rupture in any direction is equal the
corresponding radius of this spheroid_.
From the conditions assumed the following values of the semi-transverse
and semi-conjugate axes _h_ and _v_ (which are the horizontal and
vertical radii of rupture) are obtained, viz.:[10]
_h_ = _l_√(1 + 2(_r_/_l_)^2);
_v_ = _l_√[(1 + 2(_r_/_l_)^2)/(1 + (_r_/_l_)^2)].
For common mines these formulas give:
_h_ = 1.732_l_ = (7/4)_l_ = (7/4)_r_;
_v_ = 1.225_l_ = (5/4)_l_ = (5/4)_r_.
For six-line craters,
_h_ = 4.358_l_ = (35/8)_l_ = (3/2)_r_;
_v_ = 1.378_l_ = (11/8)_l_ = (1/2)_r_.
=11.= The English authorities adopt the value of (7/4)_l__{´} for
the horizontal and _l__{´} √(2) = 1.41421 _l__{´} = (7/5)_l__{´} for
the vertical radius of rupture of all classes of mines. In which
_l__{´} = L. L. R. of an equivalent common mine = _l_ + (7/8)(_r_-_l_),
etc.
Some later experiments at Chatham have given
_v_ = (5/3)_l_ for a 4-lined crater;
_v_ = 2_l_ for a 5-lined crater;
and
_v_ = (5/2)_l_ for a 7½-lined crater.
=12.= There are other good reasons for believing that Lebrun’s
value for the vertical radius is too small; but as its use leads to
increasing the charges designed to produce crushing effects, the error,
if it exists, is in the right direction, and justifies the use of the
formula until more exact data are available.
EXPLOSIVES.
=13.= No military mining operations of note have been carried
on since the introduction of dynamite and other high explosives;
consequently our knowledge of their value for work of this kind
rests entirely upon the results obtained from experimental mines.
Unfortunately but few experiments seem to have been made, and the
published results of these are very meagre.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account