Auroræ: Their Characters and SpectraCapron, J. Rand
History
Auroræ: Their Characters and Spectra
Capron, J. Rand
Auroras
The OH₂ tube presented very much the same character; but the discharge
occasionally varied from a pinkish white to a yellow colour, somewhat
like that which artists call brown-pink, and reminding one of the “golden
rays” in certain Auroræ. These O spectra presented, in common with the
carbon-tubes, three principal bright lines or bands in the yellow, green,
and blue, with a fainter one in the violet, all shading off towards
the violet. The bands, however, showed but very little trace of local
colour, and the whole spectrum had a faint and washed-out look, very
different from the carbon-spectra. (I certainly, by a little management,
subsequently succeeded in getting the same look to the C.A. spectrum; but
it was only by removing the tube to some distance from the slit, and thus
depriving the spectrum of very much of its brightness.) The hydrogen line
(solar F) was bright, more so than any of the O lines.
The intensity of the three principal lines seemed to me to run in the
following order:—
Yellow. Green. Blue.
Coal-gas β α γ
Oxygen γ α β
Between the lines γ and α in the Geissler O tube I found a rather bright
line, which I shall have occasion to refer to hereafter.
At 12 inches distance from the slit the O spectrum lost nearly all
its light; the H line, and the three lines γ, α, and β, alone faintly
remaining, α being decidedly the brightest. At 24 inches no spectrum at
all was to be seen.
[Sidenote: Comparison of spectra of coal-gas and O tubes.]
I carefully compared together the three principal lines of the two
spectra of coal-gas and O by means of:—
1st, the photographed micrometer before described;
2nd, a comparison-prism on the slit plate;
3rd, a piece of very fine brass foil cut as a pointer and fixed in the
focus of a positive eyepiece.
The lines or bands in both tubes were found to be slightly nebulous
towards the less-refrangible end (where they were measured), and the O
tube was not bright under a moderately high power (positive eyepiece).
Subject to these remarks, the three principal lines in both tubes were
found to correspond in position within the limits of my instrument. The
spectra did not, however, I am bound to say, _look_ alike.
[Sidenote: Dr. Vogel’s O spectrum reduced and compared.]
Puzzled by these observations, it then occurred to me to reduce Dr.
Vogel’s spectrum of O, given in his memoir, to the same scale with my
own. This I did independently, and I then compared the result with my own
spectrum as mapped out. From the comparison, I judge that if my O tubes,
one and all, showed a carbon-spectrum, the learned Doctor’s tube must
have been subject to a similar infirmity, as the tubes all agreed in main
features.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account