Auroræ: Their Characters and SpectraCapron, J. Rand
History
Auroræ: Their Characters and Spectra
Capron, J. Rand
Auroras
I next examined two vacuum-tubes of an entirely different character. The
one was a tube from Geissler of stout glass, some fifteen inches long,
without electrodes, and an inch across. Within this tube was a second
of uranium glass, with bulbs blown in it. In contact with both tubes a
quantity of fluid mercury ran loose (Plate X. fig. 7). Upon shaking this
tube with the hand brilliant flashes of blue-white light, like summer
lightning, flashed out. These were discernible (though faintly) even in
daylight. The fine terminal wires of the coil being wrapped round each
end of this tube, when the current passed, a bright and white induced
discharge, with a considerable amount of stratification, was seen in the
tube. The other tube was that of a mercurial siphon-barometer. This being
placed in a stand, one terminal wire was placed in the mercury in the
short leg of the siphon, while the other terminal was made into a little
coil and placed on the upper closed extremity of the barometer-tube. On
passing the current, the entire short space above the mercury was filled
with a grey-white light, not stratified, but showing a conspicuous bright
ring just above the level of the mercury.
[Sidenote: Spectrum of both these tubes described.]
Both these tubes, when examined with the spectroscope, showed four bright
rather uniform bands (the central one being the brightest), which I
assigned to the carbon-spectra (see Plate XIV. spectra 5 and 6).
The Geissler tube was probably filled designedly with coal-gas. In the
case of the barometer-tube the spectrum must be assumed to be the result
of some carbon impurity.
No lines of mercury could be detected in either case.
An effort was made to examine the light of the Geissler mercury-tube as
excited by motion only, but the spectrum could not be kept in the field;
the four lines were, however, seen to flash out as the light passed
before the slit.
[Illustration: Plate XV.]
_Air-tubes._
[Sidenote: Air-tube illuminated.]
The first tube I examined was an ordinary Geissler tube charged with
rarefied air. The bulbs, on passing the discharge, were filled with the
well-known rose-tinged light like to the Aurora-streams. This in the
capillary part was condensed into a brighter and whiter thread, while the
platinum wire of the negative pole was surrounded by its characteristic
mauve or violet glow.
[Sidenote: Spectrum described.]
The spectrum, even with a weak current, was quite bright, and consisted
mainly of the nitrogen-lines and bands, with the lines Hα, Hβ, and Hγ,
and some of the intermediate lines of the H tube.
The double line α was undoubtedly the brightest in the spectrum when
taken in the capillary part of the tube. After this followed β, and then
γ(H), δ, and ε. I was, however, uncertain as to the relative brightness
of the last three, and marked their intensities with hesitation. I tested
them several times independently with differing results, and suspected
them of variability with the current.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account