Auroræ: Their Characters and SpectraCapron, J. Rand
History
Auroræ: Their Characters and Spectra
Capron, J. Rand
Auroras
(5) A piece of quill glass tubing was selected, 5 millims. in diameter
and 1 millim. thick, and drawn out to a point, the end of which was
snapped off and the tubing connected as before. The flame was 20 millims.
high, and 5 millims. across, and somewhat lambent. On being placed (1)
between the conical ends and (2) between the flat ends of the armatures,
no effect could be seen on the flame.
[Sidenote: Effect on taper and spirit-lamp flames.]
(6) A small taper-flame was placed between the poles of the magnet: no
effect was produced, except that the flame gave a slight “jump” each time
the magnet was excited. A spirit-lamp flame was tried with a similar
result.
_Action of Magnet on a bar of heavy glass._
[Sidenote: Heavy glass bar and mounting described.]
A piece of heavy yellow-tinted glass was selected, being a bar 10
centimetres in length, and 8 millimetres square. This was mounted in a
frame with a Nicol prism at one end, and a double-image prism (next the
eye) at the other.
[Sidenote: Placed along poles of magnet. Effect of magnet on
candle-images.]
(1) The glass bar and mounting were placed upon and along the poles
of the magnet (in the direction of the magnetic curves), and the
double-image prism and Nicol were so adjusted that two images of a candle
were seen—the one below bright and normal, the one above, by rotation of
the prism, as nearly as possible extinguished (Plate XVII. fig. 4). On
exciting the magnet the faint image at once conspicuously brightened,
at the same time assuming a slightly green tinge. To get full effect of
brightening, it seemed necessary to have good pressure-contact between
the battery-wires and the binding-screws.
[Sidenote: Effect on using a tourmaline as analyzer.]
(2) Using a tourmaline as analyzer in lieu of the double-image prism,
the candle-flame was seen alternately brightened and darkened, as the
tourmaline was rotated; and when the image was obscured by rotation,
excitation of the magnet caused it to brighten strongly. This effect was
accompanied by the apparent removal of a dusky red patch or spot, which
occupied the centre of the field when the flame was obscured.
[Sidenote: Bar placed at right angles to the poles: no effect produced.]
(3) The bar of glass and double-image prism being placed between the
conical ends of the armatures, but at right angles to, instead of along,
the poles, upon excitation of the magnet no effect at all was produced.
(4) The bar and prism being placed in the same position between the flat
ends of the armatures, no effect at all was produced.
[Sidenote: Slight effect on second experiment.]
(4_a_) Experiment No. 4 was repeated. It was thought that on excitation
of the magnet the secondary image slightly brightened; but there was a
doubt about it, and the effect (if any) was slight.
[Sidenote: Effects produced when a biquartz was introduced.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account