Australia -- Politics and government; Great Britain -- Colonies -- Australia
as there was no possibility of getting it through the Council; its
introduction appears to have been due to the desire that it should be
discussed at the pending General Elections. The principal clause
provided that "any Bill which shall be passed by the House of Assembly
in two consecutive sessions of Parliament, and which shall be rejected
by the Legislative Council in each of {180} two such consecutive
sessions, may be submitted for the approval of the people of Tasmania
by means of a general poll of, or referendum to, the electors for the
House of Assembly." An interval of not less than six weeks was to
elapse between the two sessions, and where a Bill had been amended by
the Council, the Assembly was to be vested with the final decision
whether the amendments effected such substantial alterations as to be
tantamount to a rejection, and might present an address to the Governor
requesting that a Bill which had been rejected twice or substantially
altered might be submitted to a general vote of the electors. A bare
majority of the votes so recorded was to be sufficient to secure the
enactment of the measure subject to the constitutional rights of the
Governor.
The placid progress of the Session was impaired by the introduction of
a private railway Bill, which led to many nights of contentious debate
and much hostility among the various sections in the Assembly. All the
railways are owned by the State with the exception of a few short lines
in the Northern and Western portions of the Province which have been
constructed by Mining Companies without any concessions from the
Government. During recent years the Western district has become an
important mining centre, and should, in the opinion of most Tasmanians,
be connected by railway with either Launceston or Hobart. But the
condition of the {181} finances is such, as has already been seen, that
the Government cannot venture to undertake the construction of further
public works unless it can be shown that they will immediately give an
adequate return upon the outlay. The small surplus of the last two
years was obtained at the cost of rigid retrenchment and high direct
taxation, an income tax of eightpence in the pound upon incomes derived
from personal exertion, and a shilling upon those derived from
property, and a land-tax of a halfpenny in the pound upon the capital
value of land. It, therefore, became necessary, if the construction of
the line or lines were not to be postponed indefinitely, that the aid
of private enterprise should be invoked and that concessions should be
offered which would be sufficient to attract private capitalists.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account