Australia -- Politics and government; Great Britain -- Colonies -- Australia
The antagonism was renewed in 1894 upon the proposals for additional
taxation, by which the Premier, Mr. Turner, hoped to cope with an
anticipated deficiency in the revenue of more than half a million
pounds. His scheme included the repeal of the existing land-tax, under
which landed estates of upwards of 640 acres in extent are taxed
annually upon the excess of the capital value over L2,500--an impost
which obviously penalises rural, at the expense of urban, properties
and was intended to promote the subdivision of the land (though it does
not appear to have had much effect in that direction); and the
imposition of a tax on unimproved values at the rate of 1d. in the L,
subject to the exemption of L100 when the value does not exceed L1,000,
and of an income tax which, subject to the exemption of incomes not
exceeding L200, was to be at the rate of 3d. in the L on incomes
derived from personal exertion and 6d. on incomes derived from property
up to L2,200, above which sum the amount was in both cases to be
doubled. Absentees were to pay an additional 20 per cent., {125} and
incomes from land were to be exempt where the owner paid the land-tax.
These taxes, it was calculated, would yield an annual revenue of
L600,000. The Finance Bill was passed in the Assembly at its second
reading by a majority of twenty-two, but in committee it was amended so
as to exempt from the land-tax land values of less than L500. The
resultant deficiency in the proceeds of the tax was made up by a
continuance of the primage duties and by an increase of the tax on
incomes derived from personal exertion. Upon its transmission to the
Council the Bill was summarily rejected, the Minister who was in charge
of it alone, beyond the tellers, being in its favour, on the ground
that the questions of a tax on unimproved values had not been submitted
to the electorate and that, in the existing conditions of the Province,
any further burden upon the producers would be opposed to its best
interests. The Ministry accepted the decision of the Council and
contented themselves with rigid retrenchment, the continuance of the
existing land-tax, and the imposition of a progressive income tax which
rises to a maximum of sixteen-pence upon the excess over L2,000 of
incomes derived from property. According to a statement of the
Premier, they intend to make the question a distinct issue at the next
elections, and will in the meanwhile take no action in the matter.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account