Australia -- Politics and government; Great Britain -- Colonies -- Australia
proved to have been entirely justified in his language, but was saddled
with an enormous bill of costs as the reward of his patriotic efforts
on behalf of the community. The danger that similar proposals might be
carried in the future was lessened in 1890, when the Standing Committee
was appointed as a check upon the extravagant tendencies and culpable
pliability of individual members.
Again, in connection with water supply and irrigation, the expenditure
has been on an extravagant scale. The Melbourne Waterworks are {144}
justified by the requirements of the metropolis, but those of Geelong
and of Bendigo and adjacent areas commenced in 1865, and constructed at
a capital cost of L1,427,000, show an annual deficit of L35,000; and
other national works which cost L830,000 are dependent for a return
upon irrigation trusts, most of which are unable to meet their own
liabilities. Apart from this direct expenditure, the State has
advanced L2,438,000 to local bodies, urban and rural waterworks trusts
and irrigation trusts. Adding together these different amounts, we
find the total direct and indirect expenditure of the State to have
been L4,695,000, and we learn from the report of a recent Royal
Commission that the annual revenue is about L68,000, or less than 1-1/2
per cent. upon the capital. As the money bears an average interest of
4 per cent., the loss to the consolidated revenue is at the rate of
L120,000 a year. The expenditure was based upon the principle that the
national credit should be pledged in order that farmers and land and
property owners might be assisted to provide works of water supply
which would accelerate the permanent settlement of many parts of the
Province. Loans had been granted to municipalities before 1881, but in
that year the question was treated comprehensively by the Water
Conservation Act, which authorised the constitution of trusts for the
construction of works of water supply for domestic purposes and the use
of stock. In 1883 the Act was amended so as to include trusts {145}
formed for the promotion of works of irrigation. The Urban Trusts and
local bodies generally have met their obligations satisfactorily, with
the exception of some of the latter, which, instead of striking higher
rates or increasing the charge for the water, appear to have hoped that
the State would step in and relieve them of their liabilities. The
Rural and Irrigation Trusts also have attempted to throw the duty of
paying interest on the cost of the works upon the taxpayers of the
whole province. In the latter case the Public Works Department cannot
be absolved from blame. It is clear from the report of the Commission
that money was advanced to Irrigation Trusts without an adequate
preliminary investigation of the amount of water available or of the
number of settlers who would make use of it. "The public mind was
excited at the time, and the gospel of irrigation was preached from one
end of the Colony to the other.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account