Antislavery movements -- United States; Slavery -- United States
A certain ardent conservative friend of mine, to whom I once proposed
this inquiry, made a short answer to it after this fashion:--“The
abolitionists are all fools and fanatics. Whenever the idea of
anti-slavery gets hold of a man, he takes leave of his common sense,
and is thenceforth as one possessed. I would put a padlock on every
such crazy fellow’s mouth.” My friend’s rule, it will be seen, is a
very broad one; stopping the mouths of all who speak foolishly. Who
will undertake to see it fairly applied? or who could feel quite free
from nervousness in view of its possible operation? Under an infallible
administration, I apprehend, many--some, perhaps, even of the most
strenuous advocates of the law--might find themselves uncomfortably
implicated, who at present hardly suspect the danger. “By’rlakin, a
parlous fear! my masters, you ought to consider with yourselves!”
I am constrained to confess, that in the very midst of my friend’s
aforesaid patriotic diatribe against folly and fanaticism, and his plea
for a summary fool-act, I could not keep out of my mind some wicked
recollections of Horace’s lines:
_Communi sensu plane caret_, inquimus. Eheu!
Quam temere in _nosmet_ legem sancimus iniquam!
It must in all candor be confessed, that there is something in the
subject of slavery which, when fairly looked at and realized, is a
little trying to one’s sanity. Even such intellects as John Wesley’s
and Thomas Jefferson’s, seem to stagger a little under a view of the
appalling sum of iniquity and wretchedness which the word represents,
and vent their excitement in terms not particularly measured. What
wonder, then, if men of simpler minds should now and then be thrown
quite off the balance, and think and say some things that are really
unwise. I think, indeed, it will have to be confessed, that we have
had fools and fanatics on both sides of the slavery question; and it
is altogether among the probabilities, that such will continue to be
the case hereafter. Still, until we have some infallible criterion to
distinguish actual folly from that which foolish people merely think
such, I fancy we must forego the convenience of my friend’s summary
process, and, giving leave to every man to speak his mind, leave it
to Time--great sifter of men and opinions--to separate between the
precious and the vile.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account