Nabû-nâdin-aḫi, son of Bêl-aḫê-iddin, grandson of Ardi-Nêrgal,
spoke thus to Shûm-ukîn, son of Mushallimu, saying: “Give me thy
daughter, Ina-Esaggil-banat, the maiden, to wife, for
Uballitsu-Gula, my son.” Shûm-ukîn listened to him and gave his
maiden daughter, Ina-Esaggil-banat to Uballitsu-Gula, his son. He
gave also one mina of silver, three female slaves named, and house
furniture, with Ina-Esaggil-banat, his daughter, as a
marriage-portion to Nabû-nâdin-aḫi. Nanâ-kishirat, the maid of
Shûm-ukîn in lieu of two-thirds of a mina of silver, her full
price, Shûm-ukîn gave to Nabû-nâdin-aḫi out of the one mina of
silver for her marriage-portion. The deficiency, one-third of a
mina of silver, Shûm-ukîn will give Nabû-nâdin-aḫi, and then her
marriage-portion is paid. Each took a writing.
Here the father negotiates for his son. There is no evidence of any
bride-price being paid. But the examples of this kind of document are too
few for us to establish any fixed conclusions. In the following case
something very like it appears.(270)
(M337)
Dâgil-ilâni, son of Zambubu, spoke thus to Ḥammâ, daughter of
Nêrgal-iddin, son of Babûtu, saying: “Give me thy daughter,
Latubashinni, she shall be my wife.” Ḥammâ listened to him and
gave him her daughter, Latubashinni, to wife; and Dâgil-ilâni, in
the joy of his heart, gave to Ḥammâ for Latubashinni, her
daughter, Ana-eli-bêli-âmur, a maid, for half a mina of silver and
a mina and a half of silver to boot. The day that Dâgil-ilâni
shall take a second wife, Dâgil-ilâni shall give Latubashinni a
mina of silver and she shall go back where she was before. With
the cognisance of Shûm-iddin, son of Ina-êšhi-eter, son of
Sin-damaku.
Here the man himself negotiates. The mother gives the bride. Whether he
really buys her is hard to say. The mother may have adopted the girl to
care for her old age, as was often done. The bridegroom may have
compensated the mother with means to adopt another daughter. What _locus
standi_ Shûm-iddin had is not clear. He may have been the real father of
the bride and so had to be satisfied that she was fairly treated by the
change in her position. Or his consent to the bridegroom’s alliance may
have been needed. The penalty set down for divorce is not high and the
bride was probably poor; we see she was portionless. In other cases it was
as high as six minas of silver.(271) Occasionally the deed of marriage
also named a penalty for adultery on the part of the wife.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account