The rock-tombs south-east of Mandisha, mentioned by Ascherson (_l.c._
p. 145), may possibly be further remains of the Egyptian epoch, and
the same is the case with some rock-chambers found by the Survey
in the south part of the oasis, some 3 kilometres south of Ain el
Haiss. The latter are excavated in an isolated rock-mass (sandstone)
some 20 metres in diameter and 6 metres high. The chief entrance is on
the south-east side of the rock, by what looks from a short distance
like a mere crack; this entrance leads into a series of four small low
chambers (each about 3 metres square), with a deeper channel running
along the centre. Other similar chambers are found entering from
the north side. No inscriptions appear to exist except a few Arabic
scratches near the principal entrance, and the chambers were empty.
(_b_) ROMAN ANTIQUITIES.
The Roman structures in the oasis differ generally from those of the
Egyptian era in being built of crude brick instead of stone. They
show, however, a great solidity of construction; for this reason these
erections of the Romans have in many cases outlasted those of the
Coptic period which were built long afterwards; in Baharia the old
Roman underground aqueducts still serve for the conveyance of water
from the springs to the irrigated tracts, and the present inhabitants
are far too indolent to construct similar channels for themselves.
According to Ascherson (_l.c._ p. 140) the village of El Qasr owes
its name to a Roman castle, abundant remains of which still exist
under the modern houses.
The most important of the Roman ruins of Baharia was however until
recently an arch situated close to the north of El Qasr. Cailliaud
(_l.c._ p. 183) describes the structure (as seen in 1820) as
consisting of an “arc de triomphe” standing on an embankment 39½
metres long, with a dressed stone revetment;[66] this embankment
rises 10 metres from the ground-level at the north side, and is
level with the soil of the village to the south. The principal
façade is to the north. The courses of the masonry are 27 to 30
centimetres high, and show a peculiar construction, headers and
stretchers being built in alternate courses. The wall, which was
about 2·3 metres thick, and built with a strongly-marked batter,
had an ornamental cornice all round; above this came a sort of
parapet 90 centimetres high. The substance of the embankment is a
kind of concrete of irregularly-shaped stones set in cement.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account