Humorous stories; Legal stories; London (England) -- Fiction; Trials (Breach of promise) -- Fiction
Mr. Perker had a dinner party that day, which was certified by the
lights in the drawing-room windows, the sound of an improved grand
piano, and an improveable cabinet voice issuing therefrom; and a
rather overpowering smell of meat which prevaded the steps and entry.
In fact, a couple of very good country agencies happening to come up
to town at the same time, an agreeable little party had been got
together to meet them, comprising Mr. Snicks the Life Office
Secretary, Mr. Prosee the eminent counsel, three solicitors, one
commissioner of bankrupts, a special pleader from the Temple, a
small-eyed peremptory young gentleman, his pupil, who had written a
lively book about the law of demises, with a vast quantity of
marginal notes and references; and several other eminent and
distinguished personages. From this society little Mr. Perker
detached himself on his clerk being announced in a whisper; and
repairing to the dining-room, there found Mr. Lowten and Job Trotter
looking very dim and shadowy by the light of a kitchen candle, which
the gentleman who condescended to appear in plush shorts and cottons
for a quarterly stipend, had, with a becoming contempt for the clerk
and all things appertaining to 'the office,' placed upon the table.
'Now Lowten,' said little Mr. Perker, shutting the door, 'what's the
matter? No important letter come in a parcel, is there?'
Do we not seem to be present? We can never pass by Russell Square
without calling up the scene. Note, too, the components of that legal
dinner. Poor Sir F. Lockwood used to declare that he relished "Mr.
Prosee, the eminent counsel," more than any one of Boz's legal circle.
Yet these five words are all we know of him. But Sir Frank had
imagination, and like some of us could read between the lines, or rather,
between the words. Here was a prominent member of the Bar--was he K.C.?
a triton among the minnows--therefore heading the table, listened to with
reverence as he told of the judges, possibly of "old Stareleigh's" last
exhibition of petulance--"with it's high time for him to go, etc." But
if he had not silk, why did not Perker retain him instead of the
incapable Phunky, whom he did _not_ ask on this occasion. "I gave the
chap a good chance, but he destroyed my whole case!" "Catch me letting
him put his legs under my mahogany." Among the guests was that
"small-eyed, peremptory young gentleman"--the special pleader's pupil.
What a capital sketch has Boz given of him. "He had written a _lively_
book about the law of demises, with a vast quantity of marginal notes and
references." He had come with his teacher, who was no doubt highly
deferental to Mr. Prosee, but enough, the peremptory young gentleman may
have partly "tackled" the great man on some point of practice. The good
country agencies must have gone home delighted with their evening.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account