Battles of the nineteenth century, vol. 1 of 7Henty, G. A. (George Alfred)
History
Battles of the nineteenth century, vol. 1 of 7
Henty, G. A. (George Alfred)
Battles; Military history, Modern -- 19th century
About ten miles from the Buffalo river, which forms the eastern
frontier of Natal, rises conspicuous a tall, rocky, precipitous hill,
called in the language of the natives “Insandhlwana,” or “The place
of the little hand,” from a fancied resemblance in its form to an
outstretched hand. Near this hill was fought, on the 22nd January,
1879, one of the most desperate actions ever engaged in under the
British flag. Here, overwhelmed by numbers, an English force suffered
a complete and most disastrous defeat, and here, bravely facing
inevitable overthrow and death, English soldiers sternly answered to
the call of duty and fell with honour, grimly defiant to the last.
Of the actual details of the battle there are no complete records. The
men who could have furnished them lie under the shade of the hill, and
the veldt grass grows green over their silent and glorious bed. But
sufficient is known, as much from the subsequent testimony of their
gallant foes as from the words of the few survivors of the fatal field,
to tell us how determined, though unavailing, was the courage, how
great the self-abnegation, of the warriors who then maintained the
honour of our country.
Let us tell the story as far as it can be gathered, and if it ends with
no shout of victory, at least we can impress on our minds that the
heroic dead left a memory of which we may be sadly proud, and that they
were not found wanting in carrying on the noblest traditions of the
English people.
The Zulu kingdom was a military power that, under a line of despotic
and warlike sovereigns, had long been a standing menace to the English
colony of Natal and to the Transvaal, the Dutch Republic, which in
1878 was annexed by England. The first king of Zululand, Chaka, had so
organised his realm that it was always ready for war at short notice,
and his system was maintained by his successors--Dingaan, Panda, and
finally Cetewayo, who became monarch in 1872. Every able-bodied Zulu
was enrolled in one or other of the king’s regiments, and no one was
allowed to marry without the king’s permission. The permission to marry
was generally given as a mark of favour to a whole regiment at once for
long or good service, particularly if it had “bathed” its assegais--or,
in other words, had covered them with blood in conflict. The discipline
of the Zulu army was the sternest. Implicit obedience was required, and
every fault was punished with death. Cowardice was unknown, for the
coward dare not meet the vengeance and wrath of his king. The saying
of each man was, “I am the king’s ox”--meaning, I accept life or death
as the king may award, and my only business is to carry out his orders
without question. The burden of one of their war-songs was, “If I go
back I am killed; if I go on I am killed. It is better to go on.”
With such feelings, added to their natural fierceness and hardihood,
influencing a peculiarly powerful and athletic race of men, it may be
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account